We didn't have any issues. We bolstered our network incredibly. There is a lot of stuff running through our pipes. So, we now have a pretty strong network. We didn't initially, but we now have a really strong network and pipe environment. I don't really see any problem with it. The only problems we have are not related to Code42. They're related to the fact that we have to make sure that, at times, the people who work from home leave their technology available for us to do updates, to do scans, and things like that, but that's not a Code42 issue. That's more of an internal issue.

I haven't had any issues with stability. 

At this time we have not encountered any stability issues with the client application or the administration portal. This gives us confidence in our client backups

None. CrashPlan has worked every time we have needed it to.

No issues with stability.

None. I've never had a stability issue with CrashPlan. (IT Central Station requires a longer answer here, bafflingly, but there's nothing more to say here. I haven't experienced any stability issues. Period.)

We have not encountered any issues at all with stability. This product has been as reliable as you could hope for. It's the ultimate "set it and forget it" solution for backup and much more.

Generally speaking, no. Both the server back-end and the client side are very stable. I think that it speaks a lot to Code42's commitment to quality engineering.

On a rare occasion, the backup agent on a client machine would need to be stopped, removed, and re-installed. This has only happened on the OS X platform.

We had to tweak settings for storage servers always reporting offline due to slow responses to ping requests by the central server. Version upgrades have been a challenge for us due to our environment.

Zip, nada, none, non-existent, no issues, very stable. It was great to have such a successful implement. Nothing dragged out in the deployment.

No issues that I am aware of.

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

The solution is very stable. Very rarely do we have any issues with it. We don't have to deal with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. We find it to be reliable.

None. It has been remarkably stable and reliable. We have had more issues with our users not backing up their stuff than with the actual service itself.

Clients will from time-to-time have difficulty connecting to our backup server. This tends to be an issue with the client after an update has been pushed; never difficult to fix, but something to keep an eye on.

Only issues were settings that seemed to change on their own. This was caused by the GUI not always presenting the actual current configuration. he

This piece of software is absolutely stable.

No issues.

One of the most stable software packages I have worked with in my 20 years in IT.

Some issues were reported in regards to high CPU usage, but usually resolved with a simple uninstall and reinstall. Occurrences were minimal.

None. The application has been rock solid for us.

No issues with stability, only that the console loses connection to the off-site backup maybe once a week for 2-3 minutes.

No. We were noobies and were able to implement on our two campuses without issue. CrashPlan support is awesome and helped us. We are so very thankful for the stability and reliability that Code42's CrashPlan offers us.

Our Crashplan install has been rock-solid, we've yet to experience any real issues (knock on wood). I have no reason to think that will change though, we've done several upgrades since we started and Crashplan only seems to get better.

There are some key settings to increase the amount of memory that Crashplan can utilize that will help with stability. Also the frequency that you scan files.

The product has been very stable and once we were running has been largely trouble free after the installation was completed.

We have had no issues with stability since our initial trial and since it's been in production. Upgrades to the newer versions were seamless and we had very little downtime.

We have had no issues with stability since our initial trial and since it's in production. Upgrades to the newer versions were seamless and very little downtime.

No we have not experienced any issues with the stability of this software. Everything has been incredibly stable. No issues seen so far.

No.

I have not encountered any stability issues. The only issue we really had was with the initial server setup. We were required to put it on Windows Server 2012 and I had to re-image the storage appliance that came with Storage Server 2012 from Microsoft but was not supported. It might have worked anyway; however, it was not officially supported. Rather than fight with Code42 if we had an issue, we thought it was better to rework the storage appliance OS installation and keep our fingers crossed.

No

No, it's very reliable and stable.

No issues with stability were encountered. We installed CrashPlan on a Red Hat Linux Enterprise server and it has been running great for 1 year.

We've had an issue every once in a while with upgrades, but a quick email to support has always fixed it. Those guys know their software backwards and forwards.

We occasionally see an error where the clients cannot reach the Cloud, but that always resolves itself by the time the next Delta comes around.

We had one server that has tendency to make the client stop, but usually fixes itself if you give it a few hours. This server also has a lot of changes to the files being backed up, so that could be the issue.

No

We have not encountered any major issues with stability

NO

The service stopped working once after an upgrade, but the support did fix it very easily. It was a Java version issues. Since it is running java, the certificates didn't work at first.

None

No.

none

We've had no issues with stability.

With Kaspersky AntiVirus on Windows we had one recurring issue that it started crashing the app, I actually try to exclude it and it keeps crashing until we reinstall the application. The think is we reinstall and it takes some months until it crashed again but is an old version of CrashPlan maybe when we do the upgrade that issue will be resolved.

Some users report inability to connect to backup server. These were attributed to bad internet connections.

No stability issues.

None

None whatsoever

No, the product has been incredibly stable.

I have had a remote storage server fail to start a couple times. Its a simple fix since the service backs up all its settings and lets you just re-install to get right back to where you were.

We've had no issues with stability.

Not really. Most issues are due to other computer related problems.

Yes, we encountered an issue with the datastore implementation.

We where using net share backup repository for the CrashPlan Pro-e server, which was an implementation not supported by Crashplan. In this case a lot of computers culd not backup their files.

But beside this (our fault) never encountered real issues in stability.

No issues.

None

We have had no issues for 1 year. Very stable product.

None

Like I said earlier, no major issues with stability other than the one off's from users clients on their machines. Great software.

When it works, it works.

Not too much.