2022-09-28T12:51:00Z

What is IBM Rational Quality Manager?

Janet Staver - PeerSpot reviewer
  • 49
Published:
Search for a product comparison
PeerSpot user
0
PeerSpot user
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
May 18, 2023
May 18, 2023
We create test cases, and then we need to plan a new task plan feature from the existing task case file and execute the test results, which will be saved in RQM. So that is how we are using the tool every day. So if one day we go to the office and find out we have been signed out, we cannot do anything.
2 out of 5 answers
DP
Apr 13, 2020
We use it to manage the testing. We have both manual and automated testing and we have many teams in DHL IT services that are designing some solutions. It's part of the whole life cycle. So they implement that and then test it. We adopt more and more Agile or DevOps practices, like Scrum or Kanban, and as a part of that, the work which is implemented is tested. Historically we did a lot more manual tasks but more and more we are automating the tests and using the automation. We trigger some test automation tools from Rational Quality Manager. For example, we use Selenium or Micro Focus Quick Test Professional, or QTP. These aren't typical but we also trigger integration tests. For example, the Rational Integration Tester is triggered by RQM as well.
AB
Jun 18, 2020
We are a consultancy and we use this solution to create a testing plan, that includes test cases, for our clients. It is part of a larger suite of tools that includes Rational Functional Tester, which helps to automate the process.
Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
May 18, 2023
May 18, 2023
IBM Rational has the RFT, which is rational functional testing. We do test automation with rational functional testing. So after we do that, we can put in all the code, then I can build it, then put all the test cases, and put all the build code for the shared location. And then rational that shared location means that RQM has access to the shared location. So, when we execute, if a test case i...
2 out of 6 answers
HF
Feb 20, 2020
Currently, the user interface needs to be more user-friendly. In one of IBM's main competitors, Quality Center, the options are much more straightforward than what is offered in IBM. IBM's platform is too complicated and should be simple like Quality Center's. The integration and enhancement features need to be across all the testing tools and there needs to be integration between them. The solution should simplify the import or export as well as support multiple extensions. Overall, the solution is not user-friendly, and you need a very technical person on it in order to run it properly.
DP
Apr 13, 2020
I think it's fine from a performance perspective but usability is something that needs improvement. It might be because of the complexity. They introduce some entities before people learn how these entities link to each other. It's not intuitive. Tools like JIRA qTest are much more intuitive, for example. Quality Center is simple as well.
Download Free Report
Download our free Test Management Tools Report and find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, IDERA, and more! Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.