RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) Review

Easy to set up with good UEBA functionality

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of this solution is for security.

We use the UEBA tool.

What is most valuable?

What we are mainly using are the RSA Concentrator, RSA Decoder, Archiver, Broker, and Log Decoder.

What needs improvement?

Security needs improvement.

We would still like to know how the traffic is entering the organization. We can find out but it will take time before we know, leaving the organization vulnerable for attack.

There is no SIEM tool in the world that can provide 100% security.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for five months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability has not been an issue with this product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's a scalable solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward, not at all complex.

There are approximately 1,400 devices that are integrated into RSA in my organization. While I was not a part of the integration, from my knowledge, it would take a week.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We have looked at similar systems and find that the architecture is somewhat different, yet the functionality is similar.

What other advice do I have?

This is a product that I recommend.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) reviews from users
Learn what your peers think about RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user