COO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
MSP
Top 20
2024-02-09T17:26:00Z
Feb 9, 2024
Those evaluating this solution can research it online. They can ask their peers or just contact Huntress. They will guide them through the whole process. I would rate Huntress a 10 out of 10.
I rate Huntress a nine out of ten. Organizations are comfortable taking on certain calculated risks. However, I believe we need to employ specific types of staff to align our service delivery with our resource allocation. The Huntress platform has facilitated this crucial realignment. The tool itself does not require maintenance but there is ongoing management. Users should ensure they have an accurate inventory of the assets they need to protect, the chosen protection methods, and any additional relevant details. Assigning one or two dedicated individuals as "Champions" of the tool will help them fully leverage its benefits.
CTO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Reseller
Top 20
2024-02-05T20:33:00Z
Feb 5, 2024
I would rate Huntress ten out of ten. They are a partner and the first thing we roll out. Currently, we're not utilizing the EDR component, not because we believe it's not valuable, but simply because we already have an existing EDR solution in place. Redundancy doesn't make sense at this stage. When I first adopted Huntress, I lacked a dedicated SOC team and a comprehensive security stack. Since then, we've built a security stack with roughly twelve tools encompassing various areas, from basic spam filtering to advanced threat detection covered by Huntress, Microsoft 365 security, domain DNS filtering, and more. We established a dedicated SOC team. However, expanding our security stack does introduce the challenge of requiring additional personnel to manage and monitor these systems effectively. My intention isn't to diminish the value Huntress provides or imply it solely created an additional workload. Instead, I want to emphasize its significant role as one crucial piece within our broader security ecosystem. Being a long-standing client of Huntress provides us with significant advantages. We consider them a true partner, not just a vendor. If I need anything, whether it's a tabletop exercise or additional information, I can simply contact a few key people at Huntress, and they always go above and beyond to assist. Similarly, if I need data or someone from Huntress to present alongside me, they readily oblige. This level of support solidifies their status as a partner invested in our success and the value we bring to our clients. In essence, they offer more than just a product; they provide ongoing support and collaboration to help us improve. Huntress updates automatically. The only maintenance required is a periodic check to ensure no pending actions need our attention. It runs silently in the background. I recommend seeing Huntress in action by checking out a demo. While it's valuable to talk to a Huntress partner and do your due diligence, make sure to also engage directly with Huntress by participating in a demo, attending a webinar, or trying their product. We evaluated Huntress on our network and gained valuable insights by talking directly to a Huntress partner.
IT Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-03-29T10:25:00Z
Mar 29, 2023
I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is extremely easy to use compared to other products. There are many other products with cumbersome portals that are difficult to use. It can be very difficult to teach new engineers how to use those platforms well.
We have a hybrid model deployed for this solution where the dashboards are on the cloud, but the agents are on the machines. Overall, I would rate this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
I would give Huntress a rating of nine out of ten. The only thing that rivals it is SentinelOne Complete when it's managed and monitored by a security operations center like the offering by OverWatch.
Hackers are constantly evolving, exploiting new vulnerabilities and dwelling in small business environments—until they meet Huntress. Discover the power of managed detection and response backed by ThreatOps.
Those evaluating this solution can research it online. They can ask their peers or just contact Huntress. They will guide them through the whole process. I would rate Huntress a 10 out of 10.
I rate Huntress a nine out of ten. Organizations are comfortable taking on certain calculated risks. However, I believe we need to employ specific types of staff to align our service delivery with our resource allocation. The Huntress platform has facilitated this crucial realignment. The tool itself does not require maintenance but there is ongoing management. Users should ensure they have an accurate inventory of the assets they need to protect, the chosen protection methods, and any additional relevant details. Assigning one or two dedicated individuals as "Champions" of the tool will help them fully leverage its benefits.
I would rate Huntress ten out of ten. They are a partner and the first thing we roll out. Currently, we're not utilizing the EDR component, not because we believe it's not valuable, but simply because we already have an existing EDR solution in place. Redundancy doesn't make sense at this stage. When I first adopted Huntress, I lacked a dedicated SOC team and a comprehensive security stack. Since then, we've built a security stack with roughly twelve tools encompassing various areas, from basic spam filtering to advanced threat detection covered by Huntress, Microsoft 365 security, domain DNS filtering, and more. We established a dedicated SOC team. However, expanding our security stack does introduce the challenge of requiring additional personnel to manage and monitor these systems effectively. My intention isn't to diminish the value Huntress provides or imply it solely created an additional workload. Instead, I want to emphasize its significant role as one crucial piece within our broader security ecosystem. Being a long-standing client of Huntress provides us with significant advantages. We consider them a true partner, not just a vendor. If I need anything, whether it's a tabletop exercise or additional information, I can simply contact a few key people at Huntress, and they always go above and beyond to assist. Similarly, if I need data or someone from Huntress to present alongside me, they readily oblige. This level of support solidifies their status as a partner invested in our success and the value we bring to our clients. In essence, they offer more than just a product; they provide ongoing support and collaboration to help us improve. Huntress updates automatically. The only maintenance required is a periodic check to ensure no pending actions need our attention. It runs silently in the background. I recommend seeing Huntress in action by checking out a demo. While it's valuable to talk to a Huntress partner and do your due diligence, make sure to also engage directly with Huntress by participating in a demo, attending a webinar, or trying their product. We evaluated Huntress on our network and gained valuable insights by talking directly to a Huntress partner.
I recommend the solution to those planning to use it since I believe they should try it. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.
I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is extremely easy to use compared to other products. There are many other products with cumbersome portals that are difficult to use. It can be very difficult to teach new engineers how to use those platforms well.
We have a hybrid model deployed for this solution where the dashboards are on the cloud, but the agents are on the machines. Overall, I would rate this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
I would give Huntress a rating of nine out of ten. The only thing that rivals it is SentinelOne Complete when it's managed and monitored by a security operations center like the offering by OverWatch.