After the first full scan with Snyk, when the programmer changes something in the code, he can choose to scan the code again entirely or only the changes.
Completely scanning the code again may be the most comprehensive option, as it will identify all potential security vulnerabilities, even those introduced in the most recent changes. However, this option can be resource-intensive and time-consuming.
Scanning the changes only may be quicker and more efficient, as it will only identify the potential security vulnerabilities introduced in the most recent changes. It may not identify all of the potential security vulnerabilities, however.
The best option for a programmer will depend on the specific circumstances. For example, completely scanning the code again may be best if the programmer is concerned about missing any potential security vulnerabilities. However, if the programmer is looking for a more efficient and quicker option, scanning only the changes may be the best option.
Here are some additional things to keep in mind:
Snyk offers various scanning options, including full, incremental, and targeted scans.
The specific scanning option best for you will depend on your particular needs and requirements.
It may be best to consult a Snyk expert to determine the best scanning option for your organization.
Snyk is a user-friendly security solution that enables users to safely develop and use open source code. Users can create automatic scans that allow them to keep a close eye on their code and prevent bad actors from exploiting vulnerabilities. This enables users to find and remove vulnerabilities soon after they appear.
Benefits of Snyk
Some of the benefits of using Snyk include:
Conserves resources: Snyk easily integrates with other security solutions and uses their security features to...
After the first full scan with Snyk, when the programmer changes something in the code, he can choose to scan the code again entirely or only the changes.
The best option for a programmer will depend on the specific circumstances. For example, completely scanning the code again may be best if the programmer is concerned about missing any potential security vulnerabilities. However, if the programmer is looking for a more efficient and quicker option, scanning only the changes may be the best option.
Here are some additional things to keep in mind: