What needs improvement with Conformiq?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Conformiq.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
22 Answers

author avatar
Top 10LeaderboardReal User

Though I understand every tool will have limitations, an effort can be put in to better understand and acknowledge the issues (not every issue is a problem with Conformiq) encountered in real-time implementation, even if there is no solution. Even though the 4.1 version is a far-improved version from its earlier avatars, the performance of test generation is still an issue on real-time models we have. The reverse engineering logic, to generate models with existing manual/BPT test cases, did not work for us.

author avatar
Top 20LeaderboardReal User

When modifying the existing model, re-generate test cases and test scripts, it should overwrite the existing data from previous scripts and test cases. Improvements on the List item widget and Table widget are needed. I would like to see the output data optionally used as input for the model, as further action in the flow. It would be helpful to have support for combinatorial action on two different business activity nodes. The ability to use the result from the Response Message action widget as a variable object for further uses in the test case flow would be useful. We went to merge conflicting texts based on user request in git version control concepts.

Find out what your peers are saying about Conformiq, Broadcom, Cognizant and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.