We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

What needs improvement with Rancher Labs?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Rancher Labs.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
22 Answers

author avatar
Top 10LeaderboardReal User

We're looking for something that is even easier to use. It's a bit complicated. When you're dealing with Kubernetes, it is easier, however, there's still a lot of convoluted types of commands. The situation goes pretty deep and when things go South, you spent a lot of time trying to figure things out, and it takes a certain amount of skillsets. To ramp up those skillsets takes time. Unfortunately, we don't have the time to ramp up those skillsets to bring those things in. There are other solutions out there such as HashiCorp, which offers its own version of managing containers. It doesn't use Kubernetes; is a different way of doing it. The product could use just a little bit more Federation-type capabilities going forward when you're going to the cloud. That's the kind of stuff I can use. You've got different regions within the cloud, and just from that, we that kind of support.

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I'd like to see this solution become more stable and have more integrations with other Rancher Labs products, such as Rancher Longhorn.

Find out what your peers are saying about Rancher Labs, VMware, Nutanix and others in Container Management. Updated: November 2021.
553,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.