We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
2020-01-30T07:55:00Z

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

0

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
33 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The reporting in Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not as good as the reporting in Tenable SC. Tenable SC's reporting is extremely powerful. The reporting has a very limited customization capability. It would be beneficial if this feature could be enhanced.

2021-10-05T12:06:11Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly. We had some trouble integrating with ZeroNorth that required we contact technical support. This is an area that could be improved. We are currently running several different scanners and it would be nice to see all of them in one place. For example, Tenable.io is used for assets, whereas we have different solutions for mobile and websites. Having all of these integrated into a single dashboard would be helpful.

2020-06-07T09:08:59Z
author avatar
Top 20Consultant

I would like for them to add intervening proxy, whereby you can alter the get/put requests. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing traffic packets which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail.

2020-01-30T07:55:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable Network Security, PortSwigger, Acunetix and others in Application Security. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.