Micro Focus Business Process Testing Review

We switched from QTP to BPT. It's pretty simple to implement as compared to other frameworks.

What is most valuable?

I like the modularity in the framework.  

BPT is a fast way to develop automated tests.

The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development.

How has it helped my organization?

We implemented this in complete regression suite in an automated fashion.

What needs improvement?

The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution.

For how long have I used the solution?

5 Years

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used QTP and we switched to BPT. In BPT everybody can participate in designing automation. Even a manual tester can also write the automation component and then later an automation tester can automate the component. 

How was the initial setup?

It's pretty simple to implement this framework as compared to other frameworks in QTP.

What about the implementation team?

A vendor team was not required.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Micro Focus Business Process Testing reviews from users
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2021.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment