Netskope CASB Review

Stable, beneficial client size and effective architectural components


What is our primary use case?

We use Netskope CASB to establish an audit trail of all the accesses to SAS applications, and other applications hosted on our cloud infrastructure. We use it for the identification of shadow IT applications. Additionally, we use Netskope CASB to have the visibility of all the applications hosted on the cloud.

What is most valuable?

The client size and architectural components in Netskope are far better than other solutions.

What needs improvement?

There could be better integration with other solutions. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Netskope CASB is scalable.

How was the initial setup?

The solution is easy to implement.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is a license required for this solution and there are many licensing models available. For example, what applications are covered as part of the license.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Netskope CASB an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Netskope CASB reviews from users
...who work at a Computer Software Company
...who compared it with Zscaler SASE
Find out what your peers are saying about Netskope, McAfee, Microsoft and others in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB). Updated: August 2021.
533,285 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest