What is our primary use case?
I won't be able to disclose anything with regards to our client's contractual agreements in terms of what we have done or not, at their premises, or even if it's on the hybrid model. I'm not even allowed to disclose the name of our clients without their prior approval, so I can't really get into primary use cases.
What is most valuable?
One of the most valuable features is that it can be applied at any scale.
The value you get for the price is quite good.
What needs improvement?
It's difficult to discuss what is lacking on the solution. We would have to do a proper analysis because not every client has the same requirements.
Based on our experience up until now, even the clients, when they are looking for a proper platform, have already identified Nutanix as being the one solution that would be the most relevant to them. We would need to get into a more detailed analysis in terms of what features or benefits the clients are looking for to see if there is something lacking.
We would need to look at scalability, or reduced latency, and stuff like that. There are so many elements that are implemented for each client. As well, there may be specific areas that the client wanted to be improved. However, from our perspective, we don't see any glaring holes in the product.
The initial setup does need a team with experience with it in order to execute it correctly. It's not easy.
Some clients find the solution's cost to be too high.
For how long have I used the solution?
I haven't been using the solution for too long. I've only been using it for 18 months, so just over a year or so.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I can't speak to the stability of the solution. I'd have to discuss this aspect with my team. We do provide support and may have some recommendations in relation to that, however, at this moment, I can't really comment.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of the solution is great. If you are a large company or an enterprise, you should be able to scale it well.
How are customer service and technical support?
We actually provide technical support to our clients. Our technical team has the training, and we're able to provide guidance and clarification on our end in terms of problems or issue son the solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not straightforward. On our team, for example, we had to get to know Nutanix extremely well before we could master it. Only then would we be able to prepare the solution for different clients. If you have knowledge of the solution, the setup will be much easier. Still, it's complex.
I'm not sure how long the average deployment takes.
However, the project may not just include Nutanix. There may be other interventions that have to happen simultaneously. Typically, a project from end to end may take about three months to complete.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Some clients think the solution is quite expensive.
What other advice do I have?
In terms of advice I could give to those considering the solution, I'll say this: it all depends on what they're looking for and what their ultimate objectives are. They need to clarify that internally before landing on Nutanix.
At the same time, anyone going for hyper-converged should do so, as it's the future. Once a company decides on a solution like Nutanix, they expect to reap the benefits. Even before going with their decision, they need to know what it offers and how it will work to help them achieve their goals.
At the end of the day, it's all about our clients being more effective and efficient in their daily work or with their end clients.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
They're still evolving and we are not yet in a situation where we must interact fully. Some people will definitely come and tell you Nutanix is very, very expensive. However, expensive with regards to what? Or expensive compared to what? It's all about what you get out of it, and what kind of returns you're expecting. This is where Nutanix can make a difference.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?