Automic Workload Automation Pricing
KD
Kavish Dhingra
Manager, Delivery at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
Our company had licenses for five users at that moment in time when it was pretty okay. Our company had paid around 5,000 to 6,000 USD per license for a month.
View full review »The pricing is based on the number of servers and agents.
View full review »MH
Mohammed Hashim
Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
The cost of the solution depends on the number of systems that are being orchestrated.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Automic Workload Automation
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Automic Workload Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SS
reviewer1466166
Application Developer Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The license for Automic is around $7,000 per year, which is somewhat costly, but it includes enterprise support.
View full review »The pricing of Automic Workload Automation varies depending on the specific contract terms. While one of our customers in the banking industry has secured a favorable contract with Automic Workload Automation compared to other scheduling solutions, new contracts for Automic Workload Automation tend to be on the higher end of the pricing spectrum.
View full review »There are different licensing models, so the solution is very flexible and can align with customer needs. The pricing itself is cheaper than BMC and other options.
View full review »LR
Liviu Rosca.
System Administrator with 201-500 employees
I can't speak to the exact pricing. I don't manage that.
View full review »It costs too much. That's why we are now looking at other products.
View full review »RB
Ruairi Brennan
IT Manager at ESB
We feel that we get a good deal with the price.
We recently renewed our Automic contract last year. At renewal time, it is not about looking for an alternative product, because we can't find one. Also, Automatic is heavily integrated in our organization. The cost to change would be a huge factor for us, and we have not found any other product that is better out there.
GM
reviewer1031580
Sr Systems Analyst at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Its price is way up there with BMC. It is a little bit on the expensive side.
View full review »I'm not sure about licensing costs, but I know the base price is about $3,000, and you can get some kind of discount per node.
View full review »CB
Christine Bauder
Assistant Director of Production Services
Certain licenses can be a bit expensive. The PeopleSoft agents, in particular, are a bit pricey. We are using agent groups in our development environment which allows us to switch between the different Peoplesoft instances without having to change the host names in the jobs and without the need for multiple PS licenses.
View full review »This is quite expensive. It's one of the most expensive on the market. That said, I can't speak much about the exact pricing. I would rate it six out of ten in terms of affordability.
View full review »RR
SrProduc3570
Sr Production Control Analyst at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees
I'm really the technical guy. Pricing is not something that I deal with so I can't answer that question.
View full review »SA
Shulamit Agami
Department Manager at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Our license is for three years, or something like that.
My advice to anyone considering Automic is to know how they will use it, because they changed the license type. Previously, we used to pay for each computer. Now we pay for all the environment, no matter how much we use.
We change the license for the processors, but it depends on the environment that you want to automate, so I cannot give any advice. It depends on what you want. If you only have a few computers that you want to use, you can use it by computer, by your agents. If you have a lot of processors, don't pay for the processors. It depends on the type of environment you use it in. Sometimes you prefer to do it with the scheduling if you have a lot of workflows.
View full review »VS
VInce Sola
Manager, Application Administration at a leisure / travel company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The team at Automic are great with understanding your needs as a business. They are always willing to go the extra mile to make sure the solution works for you. This is not only something they do in their software but also in their licensing.
View full review »I don’t have much to do with this, but I’ve been told it is cheaper than the competition.
View full review »Workload Automation's pricing is excellent, especially in comparison to similar solutions.
View full review »AI
Ali Imran
Head of Branchless Banking at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
This is a support system for us, not our core business, so we purchased this product inexpensively. Later on, we came to a very good deal, but it took us three years to finalize.
We recently purchased the whole suite.
View full review »Pricing and licensing costs are based on number of servers. It is up to budget and a small scale/mid scale organisation can opt for this tool.
View full review »There are different licensing fees for cases where high availability is important. There is also a certain complexity in this type of installation.
View full review »They have changed the pricing on their licensing, and it's cheaper than before.
View full review »MS
Mladen Stankovic
Systems engineer at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive.
View full review »GN
Gokilan Navarathinam
Solutions Architect at Tata Consultancy
This solution is pretty well-priced. I would rate its pricing as four out of five.
View full review »I understand that AWA is cheaper than Control-M, but I'm not certain about the numbers.
View full review »There are a lot of new features, but we do not use them because they are too expensive. The price point could be less.
View full review »RL
Rolf-Peter Langer
Admin Developer And SAP Admin at a wholesaler/distributor
My boss says, "It is a little expensive." For example, I must pay a lot money if I need to have a DB agent. This is too expensive for us as a small company, so I use SQL *Plus. This costs us nothing.
We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive.
View full review »TR
SystemsA7501
Systems Analyst at a tech services company
Compared to our other products, it is a good price.
View full review »It would be good to have some dashboards that come with the package rather than it be a cost to add them on.
View full review »YM
Yehia Mansour
Development Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Automic Workload Automation
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Automic Workload Automation. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.