Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the #12 ranked solution in our list of EDR tools. It is most often compared to CrowdStrike Falcon: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon

What is Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is also known as Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond.

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Buyer's Guide

Download the Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: September 2021

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Pricing Advice

What users are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing:
  • "This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."
  • "In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

Filter Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Nick LaPointe
Information Security Administrator at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Does a phenomenal job in detecting anomalous behavior on the network and alerting us immediately

What is our primary use case?

We use Cybereason for endpoint detection, response, and protection.

Pros and Cons

  • "Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."
  • "Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

What other advice do I have?

My advice would be: Don't hesitate. Pull the trigger and you won't be disappointed. It's always watching the house. No matter what you throw at it, it will detect anything you give it. It detects anomalies within the environment. I would rate it an 9.5 out of 10.
FP
Senior Project Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Efficient with an easy to use interface and excellent technical support

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for security purposes.

Pros and Cons

  • "The solution is efficient."
  • "Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

What other advice do I have?

We're just customers. We don't have a business relationship with the client. I'm not a security expert. That said, I'm closely in touch with the company for training, etc. and I keep an eye on how it works for our company. The thing is with an EDR solution, it's kind of a new world for me. I've read up on Cybereason a lot, as well as other options. I was trying to understand the differences between the products. My understanding is that they are kind of a new generation of EDR, which are represented by Cybereason and by CrowdStrike. They are doing active monitoring which differentiates them…
Learn what your peers think about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2021.
534,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
TA
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
Top 5Leaderboard
Good UI and dashboard, but it has no support for mailbox security or sandboxing

What is our primary use case?

We are a solution provider and we deal with three different vendors to supply security products for our customers. One of the products that we implement for them is Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response. It is used for endpoint protection, in general, and monitoring the endpoint. Those asking for EDR usually have a security operations center (SOC). They just want to see the dashboard, the incidents, and whether something has happened on the endpoint.

Pros and Cons

  • "The dashboard is very good and you can consider it as an interactive UI."
  • "Cybereason does not have sandbox functionality."

What other advice do I have?

This is a product that I recommend for endpoint protection in general, and for the server. However, if they need mailbox security then I would recommend another product. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
AD
Global IT Project Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Good EPP, but support for Micro OS and Linux is needed

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of this solution is for Windows 10 platforms, any kind of Windows 10 platform, desktop edition, and some Windows servers for monitoring and protection.

Pros and Cons

  • "For me, the technical support is good."
  • "The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

What other advice do I have?

We are evaluating the possibility of enabling Microsoft Defender ATP, which will cover most or all of the suites and the features that we have on Cybereason as well. My advice is to evaluate carefully Microsoft Defender ATP and see if they are running fully with Microsoft. If they are evaluating anything at the endpoint level and they plan to use Mac, Windows, and Linux, they should pay attention to Microsoft solutions. Microsoft is becoming a leader in this area. The cost of Microsoft is quite high, it is something that has to be discussed with Microsoft on a case by case. I would rate this…
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.