NetIQ Identity Manager Reviews

What other advice do I have?

The way it was implemented for the company was mostly for HR integration. So we would synchronize data from SAPHR to an Active Directory. So all the new hiring, all the user provisioning was made by HR on the SAP system. This system was responsible for creating the accounts on the network and mailboxes and all that from that system. So no one has ever created a user manually in AD. It's all automatic. It's a solid product, it's a mature product. You just need to make sure that your IT personnel is properly trained. When you purchase a license, make sure you have support engaged as part of your…

What is our primary use case?

I design, deploy, and use NetIQ Identity Manager in different environments. It's mostly to provision user accounts in AD, but I also use NetIQ Identity Manager to provision (to and from) accounts with the following applications and systems: Oracle and PeopleSoft, Office 365 and Azure, EasyVista, IBM AS/400, Oracle E-Business, etc. Thanks to the role-based access control included framework, we give initial access to business resources as from the start date of the employee.

What is our primary use case?

We use this solution primarily for access.

What other advice do I have?

Do not look at features; look at real-time implementation experience. You need organization support, high-level support from management to do the change needed to implement it right. I would rate it as nine and a half out of ten because there is always something to improve.