2019-07-28T07:34:00Z

What advice do you have for others considering SAP HANA?

9

If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering SAP HANA, what would you say?

How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?

ITCS user
Guest
2727 Answers

author avatar
Top 20Real User

I recommend this solution but running SAP HANA requires deep pockets - it's costly. I rate this solution eight out of 10.

2021-08-19T11:59:33Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

This product covers almost everything, and it's scalable and very innovative. On a scale from one to ten, I would rate SAP HANA at nine.

2021-07-01T21:27:20Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The solution is cloud based I would recommend S/4HANA to other users. I rate SAP HANA as a nine out of ten.

2021-06-04T19:00:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I am not an expert in HANA. I build the enterprise bus that integrates with SAP HANA as well as other systems. We have built our own integrated platforms. The recommendation of this solution would depend on the use case and the requirements, and the price will be considered. I would rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.

2021-05-11T23:04:19Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

2021-04-05T19:05:26Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I do recommend this solution but at the same time, it is expensive. The cost will not be able to be afforded by everyone such as medium and small scale businesses. I rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.

2021-02-19T15:56:58Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has. We are going to continue to use the solution. I rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.

2021-02-14T18:20:00Z
author avatar
Top 10LeaderboardConsultant

I would recommend SAP HANA. No doubt I would definitely recommend it. But the thing is, if I adopt SAP HANA, my total cost of ownership in terms of having a functional consultant, as well as a HANA admin, would increase. I should first find a balance and analyze the data, "Do I really want to have HANA? What benefit will I have if I have HANA at my premises? And if I want to cut cost but also get the benefits of HANA, will the cloud option of HANA cater to my needs?" All those questions. That is the company analysis I should do: what do they do differently? But many companies will be driven by the business needs, but at the same time some companies will also be driven by factors like the existing relationship with other vendors, like Oracle or SQL Server, and the kind of discounts they get when they buy that product. All those things will be there as driving factors. To answer your question, I would definitely recommend SAP HANA to anyone. High availability and disaster recovery are very poor in HANA. High availability is measured on the barometer of RPO and RTO. RPO stands for recovery point objective, RTO stands for recovery time objective. The graph in which these two factors will be measured is from the five nines, the seven nines, or the three nines, that kind of factor. But it is a factor of my high availability. 99.9% of my database is available or 99.99999999%, giving a chance of 0.0001% for some kind of availability failure is because of natural disaster or some kind of electrical failures or something like that. So those are the factors you have to see for high availability. My SAP HANA, technically, can withstand those calamities and recover itself from that disaster. That is called high availability. That high availability is there, but it is very, very, very minimal. If you're talking about high availability of HANA in actual high availability markets compared to Oracle and other RDBMS, HANA is a small child. If you remember when Microsoft SQL Server came into the RDBS market back in the year 1997, when they introduced the SQL 97, then they introduced the SQL 2000, SQL 2005. At that time, they introduced the high availability called Windows Cluster log shipping, mirroring the application. At that time, in 2007 and 2008, Oracle introduced RAC, Real Application Clusters. Compared to the features of real application clusters, the Microsoft product was a small child. And Microsoft took that as a challenge and they improved and they improved. And in 2012 they introduced something called Always On. Always On is an improved version of high availability in SQL Server. HANA has to do that kind of stuff. HANA's high availability is immature. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate SAP HANA an eight.

2020-12-23T13:55:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I would rate SAP HANA a nine out of ten. Not a ten because of the price.

2020-11-26T19:14:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

We definitely plan to keep implementing this product in the future and I can recommend it. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

2020-11-10T09:31:12Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I would recommend this solution. We plan to continue using this solution for our clients. I would rate SAP HANA an eight out of ten.

2020-10-30T06:19:27Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

SAP HANA is a good product and I can recommend it. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

2020-10-29T12:21:54Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I'm not really part of the decision making team or the architecture team. I do not know if my organization has a business relationship with SAP or not. I'd rate the solution five out of ten. In the case of enterprise projects, I've heard that SAP HANA is used very widely. I would say, in general, it would be good to explore other alternatives, and not just go with HANA. It would be good to explore big data alternatives that are out there. They might be a better fit. Databricks these days seems to be quite popular. It might be an interesting alternative for some organizations. Depending on the use case, I'd recommend that other alternatives should be considered. If it's a reporting solution that people are building, which is using a lot of SAP internal data, then SAP HANA is a good option. Otherwise, other alternatives are out there.

2020-09-21T06:33:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with SAP HANA. I'd rate the solution around nine out of ten. It's practically perfect. It's a great solution and I would recommend it. There's some configuration that needs to happen at the outset, however, after that, there isn't much dependency on the technical side, which makes it very user-friendly for companies.

2020-09-21T06:33:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

We are a customer. We don't have a professional relationship with SAP. SAP HANA is not just a memory database, it's a big platform. It's a very, very safe database. It's a very safe database and the performance is very, very good for an in-memory database. For example, sometimes we use Oracle databases 18C or 19C. The data is in the memory, however, when data is running, it's very slow, due to the fact that all data is in the memory and you need to and go to write disk. Sometimes when the data is very large, we might scale up our approach, and, in the scale-up approach, sometimes it is slow in HANA. That said, the scale-up approach is very, very good. SAP has got one problem. When you start the database, all data from the tool's memory takes a very long time. We've found that IBM's non-volatile memory is better than internal memory. New users just need to be aware of that. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. The solution, overall, has fantastic performance, however, the cost makes it really hard for us to keep using it.

2020-09-17T08:05:56Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with SAP. We're using the latest version of the solution. We use an on-premises version and e have a private cloud in our company. I'd recommend the solution. If you have, for example, a huge project that's kind of a unique, scalable database I recommend SAP HANA for it. It's easy to use and handles more RAM. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

2020-09-16T08:18:29Z
author avatar
Real User

It is an SAP tool. Therefore, replicating the data from SAP to HANA is easy because it provides a high-performance area without overworking the SAP site. Working with big data is really nice in the SAP HANA database. I would rate SAP HANA a seven out of ten. I took some points because of the pricing, user experience, and stability issues.

2020-09-01T05:25:11Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

We use the on-premises deployment model. I'd advise others to wait until the software will be much more stable before implementing it. I'd rate it eight out of ten. If it was more stable and more manageable, I'd rate it higher. If people could have the ability to do things on their own within the solution, to read the software logs on their own, and get the root cause of any problem, and not just send it to the support, it would be much better.

2019-11-28T06:06:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Consultant

We use the on-premises deployment model. I'd recommend the solution. It's a very good product to learn and it's easy to use once you have an understanding of the technology. It's a nice product to work on. I'd rate it eight out of ten.

2019-11-27T05:42:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Consultant

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

2019-10-16T06:52:00Z
author avatar
Consultant

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. Right now, they say the solution is S4 HANA, but, not everything on there is S4 HANA, so it is kind of confusing that they say that they're moving us to S4 HANA, but we are not really on it. Because of that, we're not 100% happy. Once everything is properly moved over, it might be better.

2019-10-13T05:48:00Z
author avatar
Consultant

On a scale from one to ten, I rate this solution an eight. In the future I would like to see the response time of the application being much faster than it currently is. The response time on a task should be faster so that we don't have to wait for 10 seconds each time.

2019-10-03T07:51:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The biggest lesson learned was that we started late. We all should have started earlier. Out of ten, I would rate this solution as eleven.

2019-09-23T06:33:00Z
author avatar
Real User

The main lesson is the importance of ERP capability, stability, and speed. The other lesson is about knowledge transfer because that is how you learn. At the end of the day, I like it because it's one of the affordable ERP systems. I would rate is as eight of ten.

2019-09-22T06:41:00Z
author avatar
Real User

We're moving away from HANA and currently implementing a new solution which is not yet productive. Only the first part of it has become productive and I can't really say whether it's better or worse. During testing, we can see it's faster than HANA and provides the same data which is promising. I would restrain myself from providing any recommendations because that might give a false impression. I would not recommend SAP HANA because it has some issues with the speed and scalability of the size. It's also extremely expensive. It's probably the most expensive solution of all and you could expect more from it. On the other hand, we don't have much experience with other solutions yet, so it will be very difficult to provide a real recommendation. I would rate it a seven out of ten.

2019-08-26T06:42:00Z
author avatar
Consultant

We do not use the HANA features, for example, embedded scripts. This is something that we may use in the future. My advice to anybody looking to implement a relational database is to use Oracle, rather than HANA. HANA consultants are very rare and therefore costly. My testing has also shown that Oracle in memory is much faster than HANA. This is a good solution, but the vendor inaccurately promises that the database is ten-thousand times faster than Oracle. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

2019-07-29T10:11:00Z
author avatar
Real User

The SAP portfolio is huge. It covers all industries and fields. It is very wide horizontally or vertically. It has modules for all industries, fields, and for all departments: accounts, HR, production, they have a solution for each industry and for each department in any organization. There are some applications that are very sensitive to the delay or the latency so for these types of applications I would recommend SAP HANA. However, if these are not concerns, there may be other database technologies that would be more cost-effective than HANA. I would rate this solution eight out of ten.

2019-07-28T07:34:00Z
Learn what your peers think about SAP HANA. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2021.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.