The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair. Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up. The license would be better if it cheaper. I do not think it is great pricing, but I would say it's fair. Through my third-party, I locked-in for the long-term. I received some price discounts from a three-year deal versus a one-year, which I probably question a bit now. It forced us into a certain amount of licenses. From year-to-year, I can't really play with it that often or drop it if needed. I am sort of locked into a certain amount of serviceable licenses because of the long-term deal. This has nothing to do with CloudEndure. This is between the third-party and me.
I am a System Analyst at a mid-sized enterprise technology company. I am looking for a comparison between AWS CloudEndure Disaster Recovery and AWS Server migration service.
Currently using R1Soft and have major issues. We need the software to work with OVM, Linux, Windows, Sql server, Exchange, and Sharepoint. We also need bare metal recovery functionality.
Martin MashIn my opinion, there should be no expense spared for protecting the companies… more »
Tomas-DalebjörkIf you want an opensource application than there are severals, Amanda for… more »
it_user545196Check out Atempo Time Navigator. I have had R1Soft, BakBone, ArcServe and… more »