We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

What needs improvement with Automic Continuous Delivery Automation?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Automic Continuous Delivery Automation.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
22 Answers

author avatar
Top 20Real User

The initial setup can be simplified. It's a bit complex. The stability of the solution can be improved.

author avatar
Real User

The cut/paste translation can be improved. I've found that sometimes it's difficult to copy exactly between different platforms. Sometimes it takes some manual changes. The solution's implementation processes could be simplified. File transfer is not very efficient. It takes a bit longer than some other methods and when you send the file from one platform to another, especially from the mainframe, the results consumption is quite high compared to other methods. There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them. Limitations in character conversions - sometimes special characters are translated differently comparing to regular FTP transfer, even if the same code page definitions are used. It would be useful to prepare manual and instruction on possible conversion problem solvings and extended settings.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Red Hat, IBM and others in Release Automation. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.