2019-07-07T06:35:00Z

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Kiuwan.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Guest
44 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

Improvement could be made with the integration of the programming tools. The solution provides some integration tools but for now we're not using these tools very much because it's expensive and we don't get much return. In the future we might be more interested. They could also improve repositories in the solution. I also think the coding could be improved technically and include some features that could be valuable for enterprise companies.

2020-04-30T10:58:56Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The rate of false positives, where it reports issues that are not really issues, can be improved. Scanning of vulnerabilities on open-source projects is not particularly useful as it is. I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution.

2019-09-05T05:37:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

Better integration with code repositories is something that we will need. I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs. It would be helpful to have better testing for vulnerabilities in mobile development.

2019-08-28T09:52:00Z
author avatar
Real User

I do not have a clear idea about what could be better. I feel like the general tool is pretty good. The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting.

2019-07-07T06:35:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan, SonarQube, Veracode and others in Application Security. Updated: September 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.