What needs improvement with Loadbalancer.org?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Loadbalancer.org.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

22 Answers

author avatar
Top 10Real User

The configuration of Azure is a lot more simple than with Loadbalancer. It was very simple to configure it. There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience.

author avatar
Real User

Obviously the simple ones like price. Make it cheaper, make it faster. Other than that, it's a spot-on product. It doesn't have any issues; no wishes or wants with it at all.

Find out what your peers are saying about Loadbalancer.org, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: August 2020.
438,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.