2018-02-28T07:44:00Z

What needs improvement with Loadbalancer.org?

2

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Loadbalancer.org.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
33 Answers

author avatar
Top 20Real User

It doesn't have the bonding capability feature. I would like to see the bonding capability feature included and it should be easier to upgrade. The capacity that we currently have is 2G. If we could upgrade it using the same device, we could upgrade it twice without changing the hardware, that would be easier for us. It should be scalable without changing the hardware.

2020-12-03T15:07:14Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The configuration of Azure is a lot more simple than with Loadbalancer. It was very simple to configure it. There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience.

2020-04-19T07:40:00Z
author avatar
Real User

Obviously the simple ones like price. Make it cheaper, make it faster. Other than that, it's a spot-on product. It doesn't have any issues; no wishes or wants with it at all.

2018-02-28T07:44:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Loadbalancer.org, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.