Communications, Change, Project and Training Management, Training at BSS
MSP
Top 10
2024-02-08T19:27:00Z
Feb 8, 2024
It boils down to two things: before you buy and after you buy. Before you buy: Do your due diligence: Understand your organization's needs and capabilities. Evaluate your existing infrastructure: Assess your company's "capacity" to ensure compatibility. After you buy (post-selection): Choose your SI (Systems Integrator) carefully. Implement change management from the outset. Involve your training staff throughout the process. The more you keep people informed, the fewer issues you're going have. Finally, assuming the System Integrator is top-notch and does a great job, make sure you have a training staff that is compatible with not only the developers, but also the Change Management folks. It's really a three-legged stool of Project, Change, and Training Management. Or to use a different analogy, there are three different swimming lanes, and they all need to work in concert, communicate and work together. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. When Oracle bought them, those who implemented PeopleSoft were worried. People said, "PeopleSoft's dead. Oracle's going to kill them. Going to suffocate them." But thankfully, the user base was so loyal. That's what kept them alive. That's why we're still talking about PeopleSoft.
Director & CHRO at Tecple Innoventive Solutions Pvt Ltd
Real User
Top 10
2024-01-25T08:38:05Z
Jan 25, 2024
My company used to use PeopleSoft only to deal with HR-related requirements. Workforce data management, compensation management, payable time, and recruitment modules were a few modules from PeopleSoft that greatly enhanced productivity. A few years ago, the integration capabilities of the product were slightly complex to use, especially the API integrations, which were not advanced. Owing to the aforementioned reason, my company had to maintain some standalone applications. Speaking about how the tool's customization or configuration capabilities have benefitted our company's business process, I would say that PeopleSoft helped our organization when we ruled out the talent review process in our large company, where, manually, it would have been a very big task for us. My company had people, applications, and data with which we could form groups and assign projects in a proper way to get things to work out properly for the talent review process to happen. When doing an evaluation of various products two years ago, I looked at PeopleSoft in detail and saw how much it had advanced. I would say that PeopleSoft is a good product and falls under the category of the top three products that are available in the market. If people already have Oracle products or Oracle applications in their environment, I would strongly recommend PeopleSoft because it is easily compatible with Oracle. I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
I would recommend PeopleSoft for its scalability and flexibility as a solution. It has a lot to offer in terms of customization and adaptability to an organization's needs. However, the one downside is Oracle's support strategy, which has raised some concerns. I would advise potential users to thoroughly consider this aspect and check on the availability of licenses for new customers before making a decision. Overall, I would rate the solution as an eight out of ten.
Director HR Services at GTO PAY APPZ HR SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
Real User
Top 10
2023-10-09T08:31:28Z
Oct 9, 2023
If someone has a license to the tool, I recommend utilizing it completely and reap its benefits. There are so many solutions available in the market on the cloud. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.
To those planning to use the solution, I would say that they need to align themselves with the strategies framed by Oracle since it indicates where Oracle is moving. If Oracle is more focused on the cloud solution, then it is better to deploy PeopleSoft on the cloud solution than on an on-premises version since you know that Oracle is moving to the cloud. It is always better to align yourself with the strategies of your service providers. Considering the lack of support post-implementation and upgrade that needs to be done, I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
We suggest ERP to businesses depending on their business cases, budget, location, and population or crowd. We first do a proper study of a business, and on the basis of the study, we suggest some solutions. I would definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it. If one needs to improve the business or improve some internal processes, then PeopleSoft should be used. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
If you are running an financial institution or project-driven organization, there is no better solution than PeopleSoft. Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
PeopleSoft is an amazing solution. Its users can have total control of the system, including PeopleCode, Application Engine and Component Interface, along with many other tools delivered by PeopleSoft. Overall, I rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Associate Vice President Group Talent Solutions at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
2023-01-17T14:42:26Z
Jan 17, 2023
Simplicity is the key and many colleagues and others found it very difficult to navigate and the system to be too complex. Everything related to employees was handled through PeopleSoft, but I'm not sure we received sufficient benefit. That said, the solutions that would have been able to integrate and offer multiple features were more expensive. PeopleSoft delivered what it was supposed to and probably what most people wanted. I rate the solution five out of 10, not because it's a bad solution but because of integration issues and when it's compared to other peer solutions.
I would recommend this solution to other users. That being said, I would rate Microsoft Dynamics ERP higher than this solution. Microsoft products are better suited for small-scale businesses. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
DGM HR at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-01-12T15:07:39Z
Jan 12, 2022
I rate PeopleSoft 10 out of 10. I think PeopleSoft is a good tool for HR administrators. It's easy to navigate compared to the other ERPs. The management of the tool is straightforward from the employee's perspective, so the employee experience is good. PeopleSoft is intuitive, so no one needs to be taught how to use the system. It's self-evident, like Facebook or Twitter. SAP is a little more technical, and you need to understand coding.
Manager - Enterprise Business Systems at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-12-27T18:35:00Z
Dec 27, 2021
My advice to those thinking about implementing this solution is it is a dying technology. If anybody wants to implement something similar they should be looking for new systems. Oracle is not investing much into PeopleSoft. They are not enhancing it. However, they are doing some kind of change but it's not significantly enough, which could significantly help their business users. I rate PeopleSoft a seven out of ten.
Regional Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-07-07T16:32:58Z
Jul 7, 2021
We're a PeopleSoft partner. We're primarily an Oracle and are a PeopleSoft consultancy where we implement and help people use the PeopleSoft systems. Now we're combining that with UiPath, and so most of the things we do are going to be PeopleSoft system related. Having been in this business for 25 years or so, my biggest advice for PeopleSoft clients would be the same for any software client - that whenever they implement it, that they do it right and not try to do it cheaply. Once they do it right, they will realize the benefit from doing it right forever, from then on. If they do it on the cheap to take shortcuts, they will pay the price for taking those shortcuts until they get around to making the investment to fix it. Customers are often a victim of themselves by trying to do it too cheap. For example, I had one large enterprise client that asked their consulting firm how long it was going to take to put in PeopleSoft. They were putting in about everything PeopleSoft offers. It was a major implementation for the financial supply chain, human resources, payroll benefits, all that stuff. They had something like 130,000 people. It was a big, big corporation. The consultant company came back and said, "Probably two years, maybe as soon as 18 months, but probably two years to get it implemented and into production from the time we actually start." The company came back and gave them six months, and the implementation was a disaster. The company tried to blame it on the consulting firm. However, they said, "Hey, man, you gave us six months and we should have taken two years for an organization of your size and complexity." That's a little more than typical. Lots of times people will, instead of 18 months, take 12 months or 15 months. The more they try to shortcut the implementation, the more problems they create for themselves. The biggest advantage - whether they're doing PeopleSoft, SAP - et cetera - for software companies and the clients, if they're going to put in a major software system, don't try to do it the cheapest you can. Do it the best you can. If you do that, it will pay off in spades. If you don't, it will screw you. That's the biggest advice I would have. I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.
Global Manager Information Security at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2021-06-16T18:58:00Z
Jun 16, 2021
On a scale of one to ten, I would give PeopleSoft an eight. To raise that score they would have to improve the upgrade path to the cloud. The advice I would give to others who are looking into implementing PeopleSoft is to go directly for the cloud product. Don't do it on-prem. Go directly for the cloud product.
I would recommend this product to many potential customers; however, I do not believe that the price is justifiable for smaller companies. I would rate this an eight out of ten.
HR/Pay Systems Administrator/Director at a university with 10,001+ employees
MSP
2021-10-04T17:40:05Z
Oct 4, 2021
PeopleSoft is a stable solution and it has a lot of functionality. Additionally, it has good product strategist and user input support. I rate PeopleSoft a nine out of ten.
IT Strategy and Innovation Director at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-06-15T20:56:19Z
Jun 15, 2021
Given that it's a legacy product, there's not a lot of people who are looking to deploy PeopleSoft. We will be moving to a modern solution. There are no additional features that I would recommend and that it is a legacy product. Because it is not a modern tool, I would rate PeopleSoft a six out of ten. It was built on 1990s technology.
Vice President - Enterprise Applications at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-06-04T10:41:09Z
Jun 4, 2021
We are an implementor and a partner of Oracle. In our client's environment, we are using the latest version of the solution. I can't speak to the exact version number. I'd recommend the solution to other companies, however, it all depends upon the maturity of the customer, and its ability to adapt to this Tier 1 ERP's expertise. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
Senior Manager, Devops, Infrastructure, Reliability Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-05-05T22:41:55Z
May 5, 2021
I am not satisfied with this solution because its performance is not good. Everything Oracle promises is under-delivered. For example, version 12c of Oracle Database promises an in-memory capability feature, and they say that in-memory makes your workload super fast, but we haven't seen that improvement. It is a case of overpromising and under-delivering. It is also very difficult to adopt the features that Oracle keeps releasing. PeopleSoft is certainly very flexible, but we cannot use the new features. I wouldn't recommend this solution because PeopleSoft is now the end of life. There are no new customers for PeopleSoft. I wouldn't suggest anyone to go for it. It is a dying product. Even though Oracle says that it will be supporting PeopleSoft until 2030, you shouldn't go for PeopleSoft. I would rate PeopleSoft a six out of ten.
Jr. Manager-IT Infrastructure Management & IT Procurement at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-09-06T08:04:24Z
Sep 6, 2020
This is a good product and I recommend it, although it depends on the use case for the business. There are advantages and disadvantages and you need to consider the objective. On this basis, every organization measures differently, but I definitely recommend it. That said, there is no perfect product. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Based on my experience, if your company is expanding on a very high level and already has good growth in it, you could do very well with Oracle. If you want to develop your own project as well, which involves standardized as well as customized forms, that would be another reason to go with Oracle. SAP has their own advantages as well, so I would not say that Oracle is the best platform. You could go with SAP also. It depends which company asks for which ERP software. I would rate this solution as seven out of ten.
There have been a lot of upgrades in the 9.2 version with the UI and implementation of data analytics, HR analytics, the analytics dashboards have been introduced, the mobility, and the ability to use PeopleSoft applications on a mobile device. The features are good but you will have to do cost-data analysis with other modules and if it fits you can go for it. It is a good product to go with. You get all of the features, and anything that you don't get, you can customize. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
IT Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
2019-11-04T06:15:00Z
Nov 4, 2019
I'm a consultant; I've used the solution for five years and have marketed the solution for two years. We handle the private cloud deployment model with Amazon as the cloud provider. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. If they offered easier integration, and maybe a broader library of APIs that can be utilized by third-party integrations, I'd rate the solution higher.
Independent Peoplesoft Consultant at Asoft Management Consulting Inc
Real User
2019-10-28T06:33:00Z
Oct 28, 2019
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. There could be more adaptability of the system because obviously it's much better now with being able to do your own reports and navigate around, which was not the case in the past. Perhaps the developers can also work on better reporting because I think there is still room for improvement in that area. My advice to others would be to believe in the system. This solution has the potential of making life easier, so it is just a question of adaptation to it. If users are willing to give the system a chance, it should work for them.
It's important to know the product, but know the business, it's just as important. Most are going with cloud solutions because they don't want the IT departments. When you go with the cloud, you have to accept it, you can't change it. Anytime there is a change you have to pay for customization and that is very expensive. People should understand the features and the payroll policies to have it work correctly. PeopleSoft had Canadian and US payroll tables in the same table and you have to know or remember to put the correct payroll code. I don't believe in obtaining a license, it's about the working experience. People are now interested in WorkDay, for mobile computing. WorkDay was initially put in place to replace PeopleSoft from the people who designed PeopleSoft. They aimed to replace PeopleSoft with WorkDay because they were upset that PeopleSoft sold. It was a hostile bid and they didn't want to sell but it got sold. Peoplesoft has been in business since 1988, they are very mature. Review the implementation of your existing software. If you are looking for payroll software, PeopleSoft is a solid system. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Delivery Head at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2019-09-22T06:41:00Z
Sep 22, 2019
We use the on-premises deployment model. I would recommend the solution. It's very stable and scalable, which makes it a reliable solution. I would rate the solution seven out of ten.
Business/Systems Analyst at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2019-03-19T11:24:00Z
Mar 19, 2019
Spend more time in deciding the architecture and hosting environment based on the experience (virtualization, database, clustering, load balancing, server platform) on the technology side. To provide quicker benefits to the whole population, build a 2FA solution from the beginning and provide all self-service functionality right from the beginning (that can include all benefits and related documentation online) — that way management would see clear benefits.
PeopleSoft is an ERP solution that provides businesses with tools for managing their entire workforce including human resources and financial operations, such as payroll, benefits, talent management, and supply chain management. Originally developed by PeopleSoft, Inc., and later acquired by Oracle Corporation, the software helps address talent management needs and maximize employee productivity and efficiency.
PeopleSoft Features
PeopleSoft has many valuable key features. Some of the most...
I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.
It boils down to two things: before you buy and after you buy. Before you buy: Do your due diligence: Understand your organization's needs and capabilities. Evaluate your existing infrastructure: Assess your company's "capacity" to ensure compatibility. After you buy (post-selection): Choose your SI (Systems Integrator) carefully. Implement change management from the outset. Involve your training staff throughout the process. The more you keep people informed, the fewer issues you're going have. Finally, assuming the System Integrator is top-notch and does a great job, make sure you have a training staff that is compatible with not only the developers, but also the Change Management folks. It's really a three-legged stool of Project, Change, and Training Management. Or to use a different analogy, there are three different swimming lanes, and they all need to work in concert, communicate and work together. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. When Oracle bought them, those who implemented PeopleSoft were worried. People said, "PeopleSoft's dead. Oracle's going to kill them. Going to suffocate them." But thankfully, the user base was so loyal. That's what kept them alive. That's why we're still talking about PeopleSoft.
My company used to use PeopleSoft only to deal with HR-related requirements. Workforce data management, compensation management, payable time, and recruitment modules were a few modules from PeopleSoft that greatly enhanced productivity. A few years ago, the integration capabilities of the product were slightly complex to use, especially the API integrations, which were not advanced. Owing to the aforementioned reason, my company had to maintain some standalone applications. Speaking about how the tool's customization or configuration capabilities have benefitted our company's business process, I would say that PeopleSoft helped our organization when we ruled out the talent review process in our large company, where, manually, it would have been a very big task for us. My company had people, applications, and data with which we could form groups and assign projects in a proper way to get things to work out properly for the talent review process to happen. When doing an evaluation of various products two years ago, I looked at PeopleSoft in detail and saw how much it had advanced. I would say that PeopleSoft is a good product and falls under the category of the top three products that are available in the market. If people already have Oracle products or Oracle applications in their environment, I would strongly recommend PeopleSoft because it is easily compatible with Oracle. I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
I would recommend it. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I would recommend PeopleSoft for its scalability and flexibility as a solution. It has a lot to offer in terms of customization and adaptability to an organization's needs. However, the one downside is Oracle's support strategy, which has raised some concerns. I would advise potential users to thoroughly consider this aspect and check on the availability of licenses for new customers before making a decision. Overall, I would rate the solution as an eight out of ten.
If someone has a license to the tool, I recommend utilizing it completely and reap its benefits. There are so many solutions available in the market on the cloud. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.
To those planning to use the solution, I would say that they need to align themselves with the strategies framed by Oracle since it indicates where Oracle is moving. If Oracle is more focused on the cloud solution, then it is better to deploy PeopleSoft on the cloud solution than on an on-premises version since you know that Oracle is moving to the cloud. It is always better to align yourself with the strategies of your service providers. Considering the lack of support post-implementation and upgrade that needs to be done, I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
We suggest ERP to businesses depending on their business cases, budget, location, and population or crowd. We first do a proper study of a business, and on the basis of the study, we suggest some solutions. I would definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it. If one needs to improve the business or improve some internal processes, then PeopleSoft should be used. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
If you are running an financial institution or project-driven organization, there is no better solution than PeopleSoft. Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
PeopleSoft is an amazing solution. Its users can have total control of the system, including PeopleCode, Application Engine and Component Interface, along with many other tools delivered by PeopleSoft. Overall, I rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Simplicity is the key and many colleagues and others found it very difficult to navigate and the system to be too complex. Everything related to employees was handled through PeopleSoft, but I'm not sure we received sufficient benefit. That said, the solutions that would have been able to integrate and offer multiple features were more expensive. PeopleSoft delivered what it was supposed to and probably what most people wanted. I rate the solution five out of 10, not because it's a bad solution but because of integration issues and when it's compared to other peer solutions.
My advice to others is for them to do their research before they choose a solution. I rate PeopleSoft a six out of ten.
PeopleSoft is a really good product and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to other users. That being said, I would rate Microsoft Dynamics ERP higher than this solution. Microsoft products are better suited for small-scale businesses. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
I rate PeopleSoft a seven out of ten.
I would not recommend PeopleSoft over other solutions in the market that are easier to implement. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
I'd rate this solution as eight out of ten.
I rate PeopleSoft 10 out of 10. I think PeopleSoft is a good tool for HR administrators. It's easy to navigate compared to the other ERPs. The management of the tool is straightforward from the employee's perspective, so the employee experience is good. PeopleSoft is intuitive, so no one needs to be taught how to use the system. It's self-evident, like Facebook or Twitter. SAP is a little more technical, and you need to understand coding.
My advice to those thinking about implementing this solution is it is a dying technology. If anybody wants to implement something similar they should be looking for new systems. Oracle is not investing much into PeopleSoft. They are not enhancing it. However, they are doing some kind of change but it's not significantly enough, which could significantly help their business users. I rate PeopleSoft a seven out of ten.
We're a PeopleSoft partner. We're primarily an Oracle and are a PeopleSoft consultancy where we implement and help people use the PeopleSoft systems. Now we're combining that with UiPath, and so most of the things we do are going to be PeopleSoft system related. Having been in this business for 25 years or so, my biggest advice for PeopleSoft clients would be the same for any software client - that whenever they implement it, that they do it right and not try to do it cheaply. Once they do it right, they will realize the benefit from doing it right forever, from then on. If they do it on the cheap to take shortcuts, they will pay the price for taking those shortcuts until they get around to making the investment to fix it. Customers are often a victim of themselves by trying to do it too cheap. For example, I had one large enterprise client that asked their consulting firm how long it was going to take to put in PeopleSoft. They were putting in about everything PeopleSoft offers. It was a major implementation for the financial supply chain, human resources, payroll benefits, all that stuff. They had something like 130,000 people. It was a big, big corporation. The consultant company came back and said, "Probably two years, maybe as soon as 18 months, but probably two years to get it implemented and into production from the time we actually start." The company came back and gave them six months, and the implementation was a disaster. The company tried to blame it on the consulting firm. However, they said, "Hey, man, you gave us six months and we should have taken two years for an organization of your size and complexity." That's a little more than typical. Lots of times people will, instead of 18 months, take 12 months or 15 months. The more they try to shortcut the implementation, the more problems they create for themselves. The biggest advantage - whether they're doing PeopleSoft, SAP - et cetera - for software companies and the clients, if they're going to put in a major software system, don't try to do it the cheapest you can. Do it the best you can. If you do that, it will pay off in spades. If you don't, it will screw you. That's the biggest advice I would have. I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten.
On a scale of one to ten, I would give PeopleSoft an eight. To raise that score they would have to improve the upgrade path to the cloud. The advice I would give to others who are looking into implementing PeopleSoft is to go directly for the cloud product. Don't do it on-prem. Go directly for the cloud product.
I would recommend this product to many potential customers; however, I do not believe that the price is justifiable for smaller companies. I would rate this an eight out of ten.
I rate Oracle PeopleSoft five out of 10. Considering what we know and where the contemporary products are today, I wouldn't recommend PeopleSoft.
PeopleSoft is easy to develop and maintain. I would rate this solution as nine out of ten.
I would recommend the solution to others. I rate PeopleSoft as an eight out of ten.
PeopleSoft is a stable solution and it has a lot of functionality. Additionally, it has good product strategist and user input support. I rate PeopleSoft a nine out of ten.
Given that it's a legacy product, there's not a lot of people who are looking to deploy PeopleSoft. We will be moving to a modern solution. There are no additional features that I would recommend and that it is a legacy product. Because it is not a modern tool, I would rate PeopleSoft a six out of ten. It was built on 1990s technology.
We are an implementor and a partner of Oracle. In our client's environment, we are using the latest version of the solution. I can't speak to the exact version number. I'd recommend the solution to other companies, however, it all depends upon the maturity of the customer, and its ability to adapt to this Tier 1 ERP's expertise. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
I am not satisfied with this solution because its performance is not good. Everything Oracle promises is under-delivered. For example, version 12c of Oracle Database promises an in-memory capability feature, and they say that in-memory makes your workload super fast, but we haven't seen that improvement. It is a case of overpromising and under-delivering. It is also very difficult to adopt the features that Oracle keeps releasing. PeopleSoft is certainly very flexible, but we cannot use the new features. I wouldn't recommend this solution because PeopleSoft is now the end of life. There are no new customers for PeopleSoft. I wouldn't suggest anyone to go for it. It is a dying product. Even though Oracle says that it will be supporting PeopleSoft until 2030, you shouldn't go for PeopleSoft. I would rate PeopleSoft a six out of ten.
I would rate this solution a 10 out of 10.
I can recommend PeopleSoft to all institutions and companies. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
This is a good product and I recommend it, although it depends on the use case for the business. There are advantages and disadvantages and you need to consider the objective. On this basis, every organization measures differently, but I definitely recommend it. That said, there is no perfect product. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Based on my experience, if your company is expanding on a very high level and already has good growth in it, you could do very well with Oracle. If you want to develop your own project as well, which involves standardized as well as customized forms, that would be another reason to go with Oracle. SAP has their own advantages as well, so I would not say that Oracle is the best platform. You could go with SAP also. It depends which company asks for which ERP software. I would rate this solution as seven out of ten.
There have been a lot of upgrades in the 9.2 version with the UI and implementation of data analytics, HR analytics, the analytics dashboards have been introduced, the mobility, and the ability to use PeopleSoft applications on a mobile device. The features are good but you will have to do cost-data analysis with other modules and if it fits you can go for it. It is a good product to go with. You get all of the features, and anything that you don't get, you can customize. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I'm a consultant; I've used the solution for five years and have marketed the solution for two years. We handle the private cloud deployment model with Amazon as the cloud provider. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. If they offered easier integration, and maybe a broader library of APIs that can be utilized by third-party integrations, I'd rate the solution higher.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. There could be more adaptability of the system because obviously it's much better now with being able to do your own reports and navigate around, which was not the case in the past. Perhaps the developers can also work on better reporting because I think there is still room for improvement in that area. My advice to others would be to believe in the system. This solution has the potential of making life easier, so it is just a question of adaptation to it. If users are willing to give the system a chance, it should work for them.
It's important to know the product, but know the business, it's just as important. Most are going with cloud solutions because they don't want the IT departments. When you go with the cloud, you have to accept it, you can't change it. Anytime there is a change you have to pay for customization and that is very expensive. People should understand the features and the payroll policies to have it work correctly. PeopleSoft had Canadian and US payroll tables in the same table and you have to know or remember to put the correct payroll code. I don't believe in obtaining a license, it's about the working experience. People are now interested in WorkDay, for mobile computing. WorkDay was initially put in place to replace PeopleSoft from the people who designed PeopleSoft. They aimed to replace PeopleSoft with WorkDay because they were upset that PeopleSoft sold. It was a hostile bid and they didn't want to sell but it got sold. Peoplesoft has been in business since 1988, they are very mature. Review the implementation of your existing software. If you are looking for payroll software, PeopleSoft is a solid system. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We are using the on-premises deployment model. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
We use the on-premises deployment model. I would recommend the solution. It's very stable and scalable, which makes it a reliable solution. I would rate the solution seven out of ten.
Spend more time in deciding the architecture and hosting environment based on the experience (virtualization, database, clustering, load balancing, server platform) on the technology side. To provide quicker benefits to the whole population, build a 2FA solution from the beginning and provide all self-service functionality right from the beginning (that can include all benefits and related documentation online) — that way management would see clear benefits.