IBM QRadar Review

We can add anything to it, as it is a good companion to other tools

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case is for insurance and product manufacturing. We use it to create rules and Windows firewalls.

How has it helped my organization?

Before implementing this solution, we had no security. After integrating many thing, we received reports letting us know what is compromised.

What is most valuable?

It's user-friendly when compared to other products. New users can easily understand the product.

It integrates very easily with other solutions. The solution is flexible. We can add anything to it, as it is a good companion to other tools.

What needs improvement?

They should introduce some automation into the product.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has good stability. If there is an issue, we restart the box.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is easily scalable.

Our team has nine people.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, I was using McAfee Nitro. Comparing with McAfee, QRadar is user-friendly and easy to use.

How was the initial setup?

There was some complexity in the initial setup due to bandwidth issues.

The implementation took two to three days.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

Patch 13
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More IBM QRadar reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with Splunk
Learn what your peers think about IBM QRadar. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2021.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user