Being able to move things around from one array to the other has been the biggest feature for us.
Being able to move things around from one array to the other has been the biggest feature for us.
There's a little bit of performance benefit. The flexibility that we get from being able to have different vendors' storage arrays presented as one homogenous unit to our hosts has been the main benefit.
Currently, the newer features exceed our needs. What we really need is resiliency and stability in the features that are out there and do run.
We have been using the system for twelve years.
It's been pretty stable, but we've had some issues. I wouldn't say it's poor, but the resiliency has been less than what we expect from an enterprise class product.
It appears to us, over several decades, that quality control waxes and wanes. That's scary for us, because as a new system comes out and we install it, we really expect it to be an enterprise class product and not to have problems. We expect it all to be bullet-proof, and it hasn't been in our experience.
Scalability is limited, but it meets our needs.
Generally, technical support is good.
It's been a long time now, about twelve years. I forgot about previous solutions.
The initial setup was straightforward.
I'd tell them that it's a good product and they should implement it. They probably should not run the latest code and they should look very carefully at advanced features.
When selecting a vendor, honesty is one of the first things to consider, and then stability and resiliency of the products. Performance is nice, but the applications that I support need bullet-proof stuff behind it with no down time.