Silk Test Review

Although the GUI interface needs work for non-developers, its GUI mapping is valuable


What is most valuable?

  • GUI Mapping
  • 4Test

How has it helped my organization?

It speeds up testing efforts.

What needs improvement?

GUI interface could be simpler for non-developers.

For how long have I used the solution?

10 years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues with deployment.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues with deployment.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

8 out of 10.

Technical Support:

7 out of 10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

MI's Winrunner.

How was the initial setup?

It was a straightforward set-up.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Initial cost was very high, took two years to save up for it. Wish Borland's Silk was less expensive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, several free and several paid. Amongst others, we looked at Selenium, Ranorex, WTP, Rational, MI, Auto-it, and Jmoeter.

What other advice do I have?

Don't just research the automation tool, research what your needs are.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Silk Test reviews from users
...who compared it with SmartBear TestComplete
Learn what your peers think about Silk Test. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2021.
523,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest