It's flexibility is most valuable, as we're able to move things around without downtime.
It's flexibility is most valuable, as we're able to move things around without downtime.
We now have 200 virtual machines because building a machine is so easy that anyone can do it. Now, our answer is "yes" for any requests for new VMs.
More automation would be good. You can leverage CLI or vSphere with the API’s so that allows you to do anything, but if you don’t have programming experience you are limited.
Pretty solid, like any technology there are gonna be some pitfalls, nothing is perfect, but there is no clear disadvantage for making it virtual.
Very scalable, I don’t think we’ve hit a limit. Were running 2000 virtual machines on 50 hosts and that’s one data center, and we haven’t nearly hit our ceiling.
I haven’t used it that often – they are responsive. It's pretty standard, not above average.
Pretty straightforward, I've installed vCenter dozens of times, and I've run into a few issues, but other than that its pretty easy.
We've looked at Hyper-V, Citrix, Openstack, but we continue to use vSphere, because it’s a market leader – it’s a stable company, not going anywhere.
25% of the server costs are now going to VMware; it's expensive. The stability of the company is always important to look at though.