The stability is fantastic. I can't complain. Not one bit.

The tool is stable. The statefulness between the controllers works well. Uptime is very strong. I rate the stability a nine out of ten. It is a very stable platform.

The solution is extremely stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The one issue we did have was with their mesh radios. I'm not sure that it was with the radio itself, the software in the radio. They run two different firmware. One is autonomous firmware, which they use with their AP line and then lightweight APs. With the autonomous one, there's no consistency there. For the indoor APs, you'll have lightweight firmware that you need on them. And then for the outdoor mesh radios, they're not fully autonomous, yet you have to have the autonomous software on them for the mesh feature to function. That's a little bit convoluted and I kind of wished that would just have it one way or the other.

It is stable and reliable. In the last seven to eight years, we had zero downtime in our production environment. That's also because we have it in cluster mode. So, if one controller fails, the second one will automatically take over.

It is a very stable solution. My company uses various redundancy models since it is the most important factor for ensuring stability.

This solution is highly stable. We have only had one issue in seven years. We had one issue with our controllers. We upgraded our controllers and there was a little bug, but that was solved very quickly.

Also, we've never experienced any downtime.

It is a stable solution.

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze.

We really have good stability. Because classes and work work well.

The product’s stability is great.

The internet speed is high within environments. As you move further away from the access point, there is a decline in speed. Omada or Ruckus don’t have the speed degradation as you move away from the access point.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten.

It is a stable solution. The performance was good. However, most of the issues were due to changes in Cisco versions. 

There were more than 25,000 students who were using it. It was a good experience for us because Cisco supported us in our workflow. We were facing many problems before Cisco, but after implementing it, we had great functionality. And since then, we haven't changed a single AP.

The Cisco system worked well before, for many years. It was only after we started having capacity issues that we found the stability was suffering.

The tool is stable.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

There are some instances where the connectors in the tool don't allow users to browse the internet.

The stability of Cisco Wireless was excellent, with no complaints about downtime.

The solution is pretty solid in terms of stability. Out of a rating of ten, I would give them a nine. It's reliable and doesn't crash or freeze. It's not buggy at all.

The tool is very stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

Stability could be improved but it's not bad. 

Cisco Wireless has not been that stable. In the past, Cisco Wireless could handle only a small number of users per access point. Once the number of users per access point increases beyond 10 or 15, you start facing disconnection issues with the users, and the performance slows. This has been my experience in the past five years, but Cisco has made a lot of improvements in their access points over the past two years.

Now it's a multi-band network, so they have improved on that front. The connections are stable. The performance still degrades if the number of users per access point increases, but now it's 20 or 30 users on the same access point. So you have to plan your access point design and placement so no more than 20 users will be connected to one access point.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the product's stability an eight out of ten. 

It is extremely stable.

The stability of the solution has been fine for over a decade. The newer solutions will have better technology and will give us more.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

The product has been stable for the last two years.

Cisco Wireless solutions are highly scalable.

Stability's good. I'm not saying we don't end up with something flakey every once in a while, but it's not often at all.

While the product is stable, in some areas when the user sees a disconnection, we are not able to identify whether it's an access point issue or if it is due to some interference in that area of the hospital (due to hospital equipment). We need help detecting issues via the controller.

Cisco Wireless is stable.

The product is stable. Cisco provides good support services in case of outages.

The solution is stable. However, I had some issues last month with older Cisco wireless solutions. The certificates for some access points had expired and did not want to connect to the WLC.
Finally, I found a solution and got them all to work fine.

Why did I say it is stable. Since, we had installed it from 2009 until 2020 we had no major problem.
We started with a single SSID then with 2 SSIDs then we went up to 4 SSIDs. All 3 used authentication with a radius server. The fourth was managed by the WLC as Guest wifi.
This situation had to be foreseen because Cisco had announced on June 30, 2016 the dates of discontinuation and end of life of the range of our access points. The end date of routine failure analysis and new service provision had been declared on December 29, 2017.
It took 4 years later to face this certification problem.
Our network system of Cisco was really user-friendly:
-With printing with google cloud before it is stopped.
Our new MYQ system is too
- With our IP phone system
- With all practices (Windows, Mac, Tablets, phones and chromebooks)
- With our accounting system.
We really say Alhamdoulila.

The solution is very stable. There are issues with bugs or glitches. It's reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze at all.

The stability is good. 

For wireless, I would say it is good. But when we were using the Cisco firewall we found some difficulties setting up and our internet was breaking up or something like that. But from a wireless point of view, it is fine.

Also, one point which just came to my mind about Cisco is if we could have some kind of calculation for the access points because then maybe we could make a web off of all of them. "How much of that access point is required. This access point is covering this much area." If we can have that kind of information it would be easier for us to calculate the capacity. 

No issues with stability.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for stability.

It is stable and reliable.

The latest version of this technology is stable. It is stable but, the devices that are accessing the network are very dynamic. It is not as much the solution that is unstable as that the devices accessing it are constantly changing.

Cisco Wireless is stable.

The stability has been great. We haven't had any issues. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs or glitches that you have to deal with. The performance is good. 

I have had no problems at all with stability.

The solution has been quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. The performance is largely pretty good.

The stability is very good.

We don't have issues with stability. It's been quite reliable for us. We don't have issues with bugs or glitches and it doesn't seem to crash or freeze. We've had a good experience with it overall.

I would be liar if I answered if it is stable because it has only been up for two days.

But the Cisco solution overall, and Cisco Wireless generally, are 100% stable.

I find the solution to be very stable. 

The solution is stable but it could be improved. However, this could be because there are not enough APs.

There are a few issues initially with the stability but they were resolved quickly by Cisco.

 Cisco Wireless is reliable and stable. 

We have not experienced any issue with the stability of Cisco Wireless.

It's a stable product.

It's very, very stable. We have hardly ever had any problems with it as far rebooting itself, or it couldn't handle the load it had, given how we initially we sized it. It hasn't caused any problems.

It's a reliable solution.

No issues encountered.

The stability is very good. I can't find any fault. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable. 

I have a problem with the small device. Product from Series 300. Sometimes you have to reset this device. Maybe the buffer is overflowing, But after I reset the devices, it's work okay.

None encountered.

The stability could improve, there are some issues. We were told the version of the software we are using on all of the controllers is best for Cisco IOS, but we might need to update our software. Doing so might fix the stability issues we are experiencing.

The stability of the power was an issue for us recently. The access point seems to have enough power, but it turns out it did not have enough power.

The performance of Cisco is very good. It's a stable product for the most part. That said, there is always room for improvement. 

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. Within our customers, the hospital infrastructure is established from the first day, and it's still stable. 

This solution is very stable, we don't have any problems with it.

The stability of this product is good. 

The solution is stable.

The stability is excellent.

We have to do a few tweaks in order to stabilize it. We have tweaked its configuration through their support center, and we even got a third-party vendor out here to kind of take a look at it, which improved it a little but not a hundred percent. We have several users who get dropped from the Wi-Fi every once in a while. APs also don't typically work. They just stop working. We have to reboot them, and they magically work. 

With all the testing that we have done with Aruba for the last six to seven months, we have not had this problem. This is one of the key points why we are switching over.

It is stable. 

Cisco Wireless solutions are highly reliable.

We've never faced any stability issues. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

It is very stable.

The wireless controller runs smoothly, without any issues.

As a wireless solution, it's very stable.

I have not encountered any issues around the stability of this product. I'm satisfied with this aspect. It provides good functionality and hierarchy for a wireless network.

Everything is fine. Cisco products are perhaps the most reliable on the market. While deploying, we have never faced an issue.

Different issues come up for the different companies because they need different things done in their networks, so that depends on the company. But in the deployment, hardware-wise, there isn't any problem. There is always room for the improvement but, from my perspective, no problems with stability.

None.

The product is very stable.

Cisco Wireless is obviously very stable, and there's no doubt about that. When you go for Airwave, it's very stable. The new IOx is going to be stable, and we're deploying it for a couple of customers.

The solution is quite stable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs or glitches.

No real issues with stability. It’s pretty stable. We can have a backup, and restoring is easy.

We've had a good experience with the stability of this product. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable for the most part I don't recall it crashing or freezing. 

Until now, it has been stable in spite of some upgrades.

I have found Cisco Wireless to be stable.

No.

The solution is stable.

The solution is stable. 

This is a stable product.

My impression as a re-seller is that the Cisco products are stable.

The two controllers running side by side was extensively tested by die client: during production the primary controller was unplugged and within a few seconds the access points registered to the secondary controller. The client even went as far as unplugging various access points to test if the coverage hole detection worked, and was not disappointed. There was never a need to restart the controllers or any of the access points.

No issues so far.

The stability or reliability is good. The performance is not that good.

Cisco stability is okay. We call support when we have downtime.

It's stable.

We've found the stability to be very reliable. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's very good overall. 

It's stable. Although we have had an issue but it's not related to Cisco technology. It's to do with the position of the access points. They move it and it's good. They don't like to see a box so they move it which is an issue. 

Cisco Wireless is stable.

Cisco Wireless is a stable solution.

Cisco Wireless is highly stable.

It's stable, but it's expensive.

After using it for eight years, I can vouch for its stability. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable in terms of performance. 

No issues encountered.

Cisco Wireless is a stable product.

It is very stable.

Cisco Wireless' stability is quite good as of now. The recent APs are coming with a backbone of up to 5 MBPS throughput, and that is quite okay.

I have had very few issues with appliances or access points dropping off.

It's stable. It's working fine. There are some issues regarding moving the equipment. Otherwise, every three months or so we have an AP that hangs and we just restart it, that's it. Otherwise, everything's working fine.

Cisco Wireless is stable.

It is a stable solution.

We have not run into any issues related to stability.

It has been a fairly stable network, I have not had many problems with it. We had to upgrade the iOS once or twice, but that's about it. After that, we have not really had a problem.

In terms of performance, it's really good. I have never seen it go down, at least in the office environment. Deploying it in the factory may be our next use case. A lot of noise occurs in the factory, so it could be difficult to deploy a wireless solution there. That could be a challenge.

The factory environment requires more high-density capability and there are other challenges affecting the factory environment. It's a harsh environment, but I see that Cisco's user-case allows deployment in a factory environment.

No issues encountered.

The solution is stable. 

We have encountered issues with stability.

I had to reboot the controller a couple of times to force correct EAP key exchange.

None encountered.

The technology of the product is excellent. The solution is very reliable and stable.

It's a stable product.

Stability-wise, this is a good solution and the majority of people in the industry prefer Cisco and Aruba devices.

Until now they are very stable, but in some cases in which we had a problem there was a fix to solve the problem.

This is a stable product.

The stability is very good.