Bizagi vs Hyland

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
Bizagi
Based on 40 reviews.
Hyland
Based on 7 reviews.
Top Comparisons
Overview
Bizagi (stands for business agility) is run by software entrepreneurs, experts in BPM. Over 350 global customers selected Bizagi to automate their business processes which results in improved operational efficiencies, shorter time to market and business agility. With global headquarters in the UK, offices in Europe and Latin America, Bizagi is supported by implementation partners worldwide.Hyland Software Inc. is the developer of the enterprise content management and process management software suite called OnBase. Applications of the suite are used in healthcare, financial institutions, insurance, government, higher education and manufacturing. The firm has its headquarters in in Westlake, Ohio, and other offices in Lincoln, Nebraska; Irvine, California; Charlotte, North Carolina; Sao Paulo, Brazil; London, England; Tokyo, Japan; Andover, Massachusetts; and most recently, Salt Lake City, Utah and Tampa, Florida.
Sample Customers
Bizagi: adidas Group, GE Capital, Mars, Audi, Santander, Telefonica, BNP Paribas, Air France & many more - 500+ customer globally.
Perceptive Software BPMone: UWV Netherlands
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Software R&D Company
25%
Government
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Software R&D Company
31%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
7%
Legal Firm
5%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 1
No Data Available
Customer Service
Review 1 of 17
Review 1 of 6
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.