CA Endevor Software Change Manager Review

Stable, easy to use, effective for source code management in a mainframe environment


What is our primary use case?

We used Endevor for our source code management tool. We also use it for coordinating our testing that includes unit tests and system tests.

We have an on-premises mainframe environment. All of our storage is local.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are stability and ease of use.

What needs improvement?

I would like to have better integration with other products.

It's impossible to work in parallel mode with the source. For example, we have one check for many banks and you can't change the parallel source for different projects.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using CA Endevor Software Change Manager for about 20 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution and I haven't had any problem using it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have approximately 300 users in the organization.

How are customer service and technical support?

I do not have any experience with technical support. I have had no problems with it.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We will be finishing with Endevor this year.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I think that Endeavor is a good product and I recommend it.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More CA Endevor Software Change Manager reviews from users
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Micro Focus, Compuware and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: July 2021.
523,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest