Anaconda Pros and Cons

Anaconda Pros

reviewer1263258
Data Engineer at a government with self employed
The product is responsive, sleek and has a beautiful interface that is pleasant to use. It helps users to easily share code.
View full review »
reviewer1251057
Head - Data Science (Senior Program Manager) at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The most valuable feature is the set of libraries that are used to support the functionality that we require.
View full review »
reviewer1066977
Solution Architect/Technical Manager - Business Intelligence at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The most advantageous feature is the logic building.
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Anaconda. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
420,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
DanishAhmad
Master Data at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It helped us find find the optimal area for where our warehouse should be located.
View full review »
Maruf-Hossain
Data Scientist Chapter Lead, Workflow & Automation at ANZ Banking Group
The notebook feature is an improvement over RStudio.
View full review »
reviewer1094853
Sr PHP Developer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The most valuable feature is the Jupyter notebook that allows us to write the Python code, compile it on the fly, and then look at the results.
View full review »
Anshul-Gupta
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The best part of Anaconda is the media distribution that comes as part of it. It gets us started very quickly.
View full review »
reviewer1251054
Senior Software Design Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The solution is stable.
View full review »
reviewer1113135
R&D Program Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The virtual environment is very good.
View full review »

Anaconda Cons

reviewer1263258
Data Engineer at a government with self employed
One thing that hurts the product is that the company is not doing more to advertise it as a solution and make it more well known.
View full review »
reviewer1251057
Head - Data Science (Senior Program Manager) at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I think that the framework can be improved to make it easier for people to discover and use things on their own.
View full review »
reviewer1066977
Solution Architect/Technical Manager - Business Intelligence at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The ability to schedule scripts for the building and monitoring of jobs would be an advantage for this platform.
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Anaconda. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
420,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
DanishAhmad
Master Data at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I think better documentation or a step-by-step guide for installation would help, especially for on-premise users.
View full review »
Maruf-Hossain
Data Scientist Chapter Lead, Workflow & Automation at ANZ Banking Group
One feature that I would like to see is being able to use a different language in a different cell, which would allow me to mix R and Python together.
View full review »
reviewer1094853
Sr PHP Developer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Having a small guide or video on the tool would help learn how to use it and what the features are.
View full review »
reviewer1251054
Senior Software Design Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The interface could be improved. Other solutions, like Visual Studio, have much better UI.
View full review »
reviewer1113135
R&D Program Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The solution would benefit from offering more automation.
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Anaconda. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
420,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.