Ranorex Studio Implementation Team

Aws V - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

From installation to having everything set up for automation, the deployment takes around one day at most.

You have to request Ranorex, the license key, and tell them why they need the solution. What are you gonna do with it? Then they'll provide you a license key, and then you'll be able to install it. So that's just one of the hurdles. 

Then, you will get set up files. You can download the storage. You can easily set up by downloading or just visiting their site. With Ranorex, the main thing is that you have to request the setup, which is followed by a couple of details. 

We managed the deployment in-house. We have experience with installing automation tools, so no external assistance was needed. Just one person from my team worked on it.

But we didn't reach the maintenance stage. We conducted a POC, but we haven't started full-scale automation, so there hasn't been a need for ongoing maintenance.

However, we did reach out to Ranorex's support for help with specific issues, and they were reachable and provided guidance.

View full review »
FP
Quality Control Analyst at SIA

We implemented on our own, without the help of any consultants or partners.

View full review »
it_user327660 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at IGATE

My team implemented it for a customer.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Ranorex Studio
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Ranorex Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SS
Senior Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The solution was implemented in-house. 

View full review »
FP
Quality Control Analyst at SIA

We did the implementation of the solution ourselves. We only needed help with licensing. We had two to three people that did the implementation.

View full review »
SM
Associate Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

We did not use an integrator or consultant.

View full review »
MR
Quality Assurance Analyst at a legal firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We handled the deployment in-house and did not need the assistance of consultants or integrators. 

View full review »
it_user341943 - PeerSpot reviewer
Product QA Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

We implemented using an internal team. One thing I would say is that if you have the choice I would always get your automation completed by a professional team rather than manual testers looking to become automated testers. Whilst the costs may seem higher initially I’ve yet to see a manual team introduce robust, maintainable automation anywhere near the timescales that a professional team can achieve. Automation is an art.

View full review »
Thomas Bradley - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

The setup was mostly done by our in-house team with the occasional support from Ranorex. 

View full review »
it_user342594 - PeerSpot reviewer
SW Engineer at Descartes Systems Group

We implemented it in-house as the setup is easy and straightforward. It just requires some time to create and implement a good test automation workflow, however, this is irrelevant to the test automation product itself.

View full review »
SN
PLM Consultant at Thinkinnov Solution Technologies Private Limited

We use two engineers for the deployment of the solution.

View full review »
it_user333807 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Lead at a media company with 51-200 employees

We implemented the product in-house. The only tricky part is if using their floating license option, the configurations need to be set up across the network. My current organization is small so we experienced no issues. Implementing on a much larger scale could be a bit tricky.

View full review »
it_user336486 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Test Manager at Konica Minolta Business Solutions Europe GmbH

We implemented it with an in-house team with the help of a vendor team, but I expect that for companies with less strict network security policies, it would be less of a problem.

View full review »
it_user338508 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Lead Consultant in Quality Assurance and Testing (QAT) at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees

Implemented this one through an in-house team.

View full review »
it_user333822 - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Software Engineer, CI/CD Implementation at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

In-house implementation. It's great to have Ranorex paired with Bamboo and AWS

View full review »
HB
Test Expert/Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

We are doing all the installations and developing ourselves. So everything is in house.

View full review »
it_user342198 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior QA at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

In-House. It's pretty easy to implement Ranorex. The documentation itself was sufficient.

View full review »
it_user334857 - PeerSpot reviewer
Professional QA Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

We implemented it completely by ourselves. The implementation depends a bit on the requirements of the organization I think.

View full review »
TS
Test Manager/ QA Consultant at Aspire Systems
it_user326907 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Engineer at a newspaper with 501-1,000 employees

We did the implementation by ourselves, it was not that difficult to install and add the license key.

View full review »
it_user346857 - PeerSpot reviewer
Test Automation Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

The solution was implemented as an in-house one. There wasn't need to hire the vendor team since the project by itself is not that big or complex.

View full review »
it_user290649 - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees

All implementation is done in house with a small team of three to four engineers. My best advice for implementation is that if you can, try to go through a pure programming route with your implementation, and not through the recorded modules. While it may be more time investment in the beginning, it will pay off in the end because you will have a more robust suite that will scale much better then using the "standard" Ranorex Route.

View full review »
it_user328539 - PeerSpot reviewer
Staff Test Development Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

We installed and did the set-up in-house.

View full review »
it_user333708 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer/Tester at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

We performed implementation in-house. The difficulty of implementation can scale with the size and complexity of your software project, it can become quite a daunting task.

My advice is that you back up and test your current project in a separate environment. Start small, and dedicate time to learning the different Ranorex tools and features.

View full review »
it_user333795 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Test Engineer at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

We are a QA team capable of writing automation code, thus we implemented everything in-house. Before implementation, think hard on how to structure your automation code, especially your adaptors.

View full review »
it_user342603 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Support Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

We did it in-house.

View full review »
it_user334848 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Software Developer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

The initial set-up was quiet simple, and there was no need for any external help.

View full review »
it_user347709 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Test Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We implemented it in-house.

View full review »
it_user342588 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Intern at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

We used an in-house team.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Ranorex Studio
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Ranorex Studio. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.