Ranorex Studio Review

It has the ability to perform mobile test automation, but there is a problem during div element recognition.


What is most valuable?

Cross browser testing and the ability to perform mobile test automation. Due to this, you do not need to buy two different solutions for mobile and web channels separately.

How has it helped my organization?

Our core banking application is developed as a plugin of Chrome. Most of the automation tools do not work properly on Chrome, but Ranorex provides this with less maintenance costs. Also, the automation platform is useful for us.

What needs improvement?

I encountered a problem during div element recognition. This point could be enhanced.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for three years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

9/10

Technical Support:

9/10

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I had experience on QTP and RFT. They do not support the latest version of browsers or mobile environments. Their costs are high, accordingly.

How was the initial setup?

It was simple.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it in-house.

What other advice do I have?

It is simple and stable solution.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Guest