Git Review

Branch Management is helpful, but the GUI needs to be improved to make it more usable


What is our primary use case?

We use this solution to assist with our development.

We are using the on-premise deployment model, with Git installed on our server.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality.

What needs improvement?

The GUI needs to be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using this solution for ten years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of this solution is very good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

For our use, scalability is not a problem.

We do not have a very complicated installation, with fifteen users. We do not plan to increase usage at the moment.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have never used technical support, although support online is good. We have solved our technical issues by looking on the internet.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did use another solution before this one but switched because Git was a better product.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup for this solution is complex. Specifically, it is difficult for the average user to configure. One person is enough to handle the maintenance.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options before choosing this one.

What other advice do I have?

We are satisfied with this product, but updates to the interface would improve usability.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Add a Comment
Guest
Sign Up with Email