HPE Wireless WAN Review

Complex to setup, doesn't integrate well with Microsoft, and the technical support is appalling

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use this solution to back up everything and we use it for sharing files.

What is most valuable?

It's easy to use.

What needs improvement?

The initial setup could be simplified. 

The integration with Microsoft could be improved.

The scalability and the support could be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for 18 months.

We are using the latest version.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I wouldn't say that this solution is massively scalable. The scalability could be improved.

We have 24 users in our organization.

In the foreseeable future, we have plans to continue using this solution.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is appalling.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very complex. There were many problems integrating with Microsoft.

It took a good few weeks to deploy.

What about the implementation team?

We had the help of a consultant.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We don't pay a licensing fee, we purchased the product.

What other advice do I have?

I would not recommend this solution to others because of the initial issues.

Because of the issues with the installation and the integration, I would rate this solution a two out of ten.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More HPE Wireless WAN reviews from users
...who work at a Computer Software Company
...who compared it with Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: September 2021.
535,544 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user