Kaspersky Endpoint Security Review

The central management policies of this product are valuable to us

What is our primary use case?

My primary use case of this solution is to use a large enterprise endpoint protection for our computers and servers. 

What is most valuable?

I value the modular capability to house the network, device, web and email protection. Additionally, the central management policies are valuable.

What needs improvement?

We have experienced problems with downloads and integration in the past. I think it would be good for them to consider cloud integration capabilities.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of this product on a scale of one to five, is a four.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability as a four out of five stars.

How are customer service and technical support?

We use a local partner who helps us with tech support. We are happy with the services they have provided.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We switched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was difficult, because we did not know the product. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

When choosing a product, we review product functionality, financial concerns and effective deployment. We looked at McAfee and others.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with Trend Micro Apex One
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2021.
513,091 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user