Loadbalancer.org Review
The load balancers have an easy installation and a relatively simple, easy user interface to use


What is our primary use case?

We are a supplier of medical healthcare IT solutions with a focus on radiology departments. We use it to create a redundant solution with automatic failover.

We use the hardware and the software version of the Loadbalancer.org product line.

What is most valuable?

The load balancers have an easy installation and a relatively simple, easy user interface to use, which is valuable because it is not the core business of our engineers to configure network devices. With basic network knowledge, our required system functionality can be configured and maintained.

What needs improvement?

The automatic refresh of the System Overview webpage: It sometimes has an extra webpage reload (after a change) before you see it is executed. This can be confusing.

Also, possibly a more graphical overview page (with colors) to give a two second overview to see if everything is working fine.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Not so far. It seems to be very stable. In the past, we had issues with the Secure Digital (SD) cards which got corrupted and prevented the system to restart. I think this is better with the new line.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No scalability issues.

How is customer service and technical support?

Their technical support is very supportive and knowledgeable.

Which solutions did we use previously?

No previous solution was used.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I do not know if my company evaluated other solutions.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Add a Comment

Guest
Why do you like it?

Sign Up with Email