Symantec Privileged Access Manager Review

The deployment was straightforward, the provisioning, too. In general, it's not complicated to work with this solution.

What is most valuable?

Session Recording: This feature is very useful and powerful. This application is very easy, fast, and trustworthy!

How has it helped my organization?

This product allows the administrator of users control of the vault of passwords, in the sense that is known who are the privileged users and who has the power to close the session for security issues.

The answer for the requirements of the users is faster and stable. The Session Recording function in audits is accurate and functional.

What needs improvement?

The integration with AS/400 Endpoint via Transparent Login could be better and useful for some users.

For how long have I used the solution?

Almost one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Not yet.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Not yet.

How are customer service and technical support?


Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?


How was the initial setup?

The deployment was straightforward, and the provisioning, too. In general, it's not complicated to work with this solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

They can request a trial, and if the results are positive, make a PoC.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are a partner of CA. The tests were only executed for this product (CA PAM).

What other advice do I have?

Try the product.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

**Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager reviews from users
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, CyberArk, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: August 2021.
534,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user