Symantec Privileged Access Manager Pros and Cons
Symantec Privileged Access Manager Pros
We can enforce complicated password policies and very important frequent password changes.
The product is very scalable in terms of concurrent sessions that it can handle at a time, number of device it can support, accounts that it can manage, or number of nodes that you can deploy in a cluster.View full review »
CA PAM is working well for us.
The DB clustering is a really good benefit of using CA PAM.View full review »
We have received good support from the tech support team.View full review »
It reduces the viral attacks on my website. It also allows certain users access to see what happens daily.View full review »
Symantec Privileged Access Manager Cons
We experience stability issues after every patch upgrade. This is a place where CA needs to improve drastically.
The service account management functionality needs to be extended to application pools, SQL database, PowerShell scripts, service account discovery, etc.View full review »
An improvement for this solution is that it should not be constantly based on user name and password. There should be a condition to edit and update your username.View full review »
I would like this solution to be simpler. It should have a one-click access that works together with AWS.View full review »
The setup is complex.View full review »