Kaspersky Endpoint Security Reviews

Filter by:Reset all filters
industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Zain-Rehman
Real User
Senior Security Analyst at HBZ
Apr 14 2019

What is most valuable?

The manual production is what drew us to Kaspersky Endpoint Security.

How has it helped my organization?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security did help us a little but there were still some problems. For example, we had problems in processing payment issues from the gateway country… more»

What needs improvement?

This solution needs improvement in the reporting section. Reporting in Kaspersky Endpoint is good but it's not that great. The platform needs to centralize reporting… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Our license for Kaspersky Endpoint Security is on a yearly basis. We have a yearly subscription. They have multiple options available at no additional costs.

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

We have seven countries under us. Some of the countries were using McAfee and some of the countries were using Symantec.

What other advice do I have?

The advice I would give someone implementing this solution is that the management of the solution is very easy. You don't need a lot of people to manage the solution… more»

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

The remote management and new client process, plus the support, led us to Kaspersky. We are very satisfied with Kaspersky products. In the latest tests, there were some… more»
Ritesh Chandra
Reseller
Manager ICT Solution at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Aug 13 2018

What is most valuable?

* The main thing for us is that we get our reporting. * Deployment and centralized management are essential for us because of the number of loads that we have along with the number of geographic locations where we are based. * If any policy… more»

How has it helped my organization?

It has improved our performance and deployment.

What needs improvement?

* I would like to see machine learning and AI as added features. * It would be nice if they had a separate email security solution (instead of only their cloud edition), similar to what Forcepoint and Trend Micro have. * I would rate their… more»

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

In the past, we went with Trend Micro. It was okay, but we needed a change, and we opted for Kaspersky. It had a lot more features from an endpoint management standpoint. We found it better in terms of deployment. Normally, with the other… more»

What other advice do I have?

Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: * The product should work and do what it promises. * The vendor and product should have a roadmap. * Support.
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Lab, Symantec, Bitdefender and others in Endpoint Protection for Business. Updated: September 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Adnan Adnan
Real User
ICT Manager at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Mar 13 2019

What is most valuable?

The encryption is the most valuable feature.

How has it helped my organization?

We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most… more»

What needs improvement?

There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions. The logs should be more simplified… more»

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

We have multiple criteria when choosing a solution. First of all the scalability of the solution is the main criteria for me, then the technical support, especially customer service. Lastly, the ease… more»

What other advice do I have?

I would rate it an eight out of ten. An eight because of the ease of usability, the deployment is easier than other solutions and because the artificial intelligence is more stable than other… more»

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated two or three vendors before choosing Kaspersky. We chose Kaspersky because of the impact of endpoint machines. Usually, endpoint security software hurts the speed of the user's system… more»
Samie Ashraf
Real User
IT Infrastructure Manager at a construction company with 51-200 employees
Jan 09 2019

What is most valuable?

According to my security engineer, Kaspersky essentially protects the devices. Before Kaspersky, we had other solutions that always had some problems with phishing, malware, and other threats. After using Kaspersky, we never have those… more»

How has it helped my organization?

This solution hasn't really been improved any functionality on the organizational level except that there are no complaints related to the endpoint protection. With the new update, they have incorporated some advanced protection and… more»

What needs improvement?

I would like to have more forensic features. For example, if we are hit by an attack, I would like to have tools to investigate what kind of attack, who has attacked, how it was attacked, and what we could do to stop this kind of attack in… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is a cost-effective product.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We switched to Kaspersky because we had issues with other solutions. There were performance issues amongst other things. We switched to Kaspersky because we researched other opinions. Because of our security information, it is a good idea… more»
Susan Kamau
Real User
ICT Assistant
Nov 14 2017

What is most valuable?

* Network Agent * Over the network deployment * Monitoring * Reporting * Manipulation I can easily manage over 300 computers antivirus from my desk. I am able to see… more»

How has it helped my organization?

Securing our network is now easier since we have divided the task between the antivirus and the overall network firewall. This means different people can focus on the… more»

What needs improvement?

From time to time, some users loose connection via the Network Agent. This gives us a tough time, since they are in different localities, so we have to run tasks and… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is quite standard, because we use the volume licensing.

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

This is the solution I found when I joined the organization, so it is hard to tell if it was a switch.

What other advice do I have?

It is very reliable, user-friendly endpoint security software. I recommend it to any administrator.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Not applicable.
Antony Muturi
Real User
ICT/HMIS Supervisor at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
Jan 22 2019

What is most valuable?

The centralised management console. Ability to discover machines and see their realtime state. Integration with AD also helps in identifying sources of infection and acting appropriately

How has it helped my organization?

The centralized management is a nice feature. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep watching, as long as we have the right updates. In addition, it saves us time.

What needs improvement?

If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution in the long run. There should be a remover tool that is embedded on the agent. Then, it could check on… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing is fine, and it is well within reasonable rates.
Md. Shahriar Hussain
Real User
Information Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Mar 27 2019

What is most valuable?

The signature update is done securely.

What needs improvement?

There are some issues that recently happened with this solution. The American government and other countries banned Kaspersky, since it is a Russian product, and customers lost their confidence in it. There is too much deviation from… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing and licensing is competitive. It's not so different from its competitors.

What other advice do I have?

Think about the performance issues first. If I have a very good solution, but it slows down your server performance, then the productivity of your place will go down. The performance issues should be considered. Scalability should also be… more»

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

At the moment, we don't have any alternatives that we are considering.
SenIT298931
Real User
Senior IT Supervisor with 1-10 employees
Jul 29 2018

What is most valuable?

It is very efficient. I like its simplicity.

How has it helped my organization?

It works better than the previous solution.

What needs improvement?

* We would like to know where attacks are coming from. * It is hard to maintain the software and upgrade. * Sometimes, there are issues with filtering. E.g., I want to… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I received a very good deal with Kaspersky.

If you previously used a different solution, which one did you use and why did you switch?

We were previously using Symantec. I switched to Kaspersky because it was simpler and more efficient.

What other advice do I have?

Most important criteria when selecting endpoint security vendors: * Dependable * Good reviews.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

While I would recommend Kaspersky, I am now looking for a more complete solution as my business grows. I am looking for something that gives me the protection I need and… more»
See 11 More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Reviews

Articles

User Assessments By Topic About Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Lab, Symantec, Bitdefender and others in Endpoint Protection for Business. Updated: September 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Questions

What is Kaspersky Endpoint Security?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a multi-layered endpoint protection platform, based on true cybersecurity technologies. This tightly integrated solution combines fully scalable protection capabilities for physical, virtual and cloud-based endpoints including desktops, servers, mobile devices and embedded systems. Every endpoint can be managed through one unified console, giving you a complete security overview, no matter how extensive your infrastructure. Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers a reliable, enterprise-ready security platform, providing data to automatically enrich your SOC. Endpoint vulnerabilities and protection are managed together through one console, improving efficiency and reducing your TCO. It protects you from ransomware, exploits and even the most advanced forms of cyberthreats. It has Easy and effective centralized web, device and application controls reduce your attack surface and help keep users safe. And FIPS 140.2 certified full disk encryption helps fully protect confidential data on stationary and mobile devices.
Also known as
Kaspersky Work Space Security
Kaspersky Endpoint Security customers
ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Read Archived Reviews
Sign Up with Email