OpenText Data Protector Logo

OpenText Data Protector pros and cons

Vendor: OpenText
3.8 out of 5
3,451 followers
Post review
 

OpenText Data Protector Pros review quotes

MP
Jul 14, 2022
The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler.
AD
Jun 25, 2020
Data Protector is very good at automation. From the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good. I don't need to touch it, it will do it by itself.
JM
Dec 16, 2021
If you have an idea of what you are doing, it's very flexible and very stable.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Data Protector. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user503607 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 16, 2016
Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention.
Jeroen Vranckaerts - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 16, 2023
I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Andrea Trespidi - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 26, 2020
Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good.
Sarvesh Rane - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2023
The initial setup is very easy.
RagidKader - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 4, 2022
It is a traditional backup model. If you talk about file server and the official Windows database, it's a stable product.
OZ
Aug 7, 2019
The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases.
SB
Dec 1, 2022
Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will.
 

OpenText Data Protector Cons review quotes

MP
Jul 14, 2022
We have so many specific technological cracks in Micro Focus, but we are not getting the features, facilities, or coordination between the global delivery centers and the R&D team that we need to express our ideas.
AD
Jun 25, 2020
If you compare the solution with the same specific features and enhancements on another solution, Data Protector is expensive. This is especially true when compared to, for example, Veeam.
JM
Dec 16, 2021
The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match.
Learn what your peers think about OpenText Data Protector. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user503607 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 16, 2016
It can occasionally be inaccurate in its backup/recovery time estimates.
Jeroen Vranckaerts - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 16, 2023
OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced.
Andrea Trespidi - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 26, 2020
VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking.
Sarvesh Rane - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2023
In SAP restoration, we faced issues with changing the SIDs and changing the path for every backup object. It is quite a lengthy process to do that.
RagidKader - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 4, 2022
Micro Focus Data Protector must improve its overall evolution record. They need to focus on hardware based instant recovery, client recovery, and cloud ability. Now there is no cloud ability.
OZ
Aug 7, 2019
It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions.
SB
Dec 1, 2022
Micro Focus are improving Data Protector with every new version and since we began undergoing training with the latest version we have not faced any real challenges yet. However, their support does need to be improved, in my opinion. In certain critical cases that we've had, they did not provide a satisfactory level of support.