Tufin Other Solutions Considered

Arturo Morante
Network Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
We could only test AlgoSec for a little while. Our group is part of a larger group of products. When we were doing our PoC for AlgoSec, we were told to stop. The decision was made to move to Tufin because it has group-wise technology, chosen for the acclimation of firewall policies. AlgoSec is much prettier, it's much simpler, and has a cleaner interface. Functionality-wise, it's pretty similar, from what I read in the AlgoSec documentation. Tufin has a few extra features, but AlgoSec is much cleaner, it's prettier. Going with Tufin was not a technical decision, it was "politics." The largest group uses Tufin, so other group members have to use Tufin as well. It's mandatory. View full review »
Syahrul Fitri
Specialist in Network Security Operations Support at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The decision was made before I joined the organization. I don't know if they looked at competitors or not. Currently, we are looking at AlgoSec, if it can replace Tufin or compete with Tufin in terms of features. The main differences between the two are only in the pricing and the look and feel. They both do the same thing. Both will be able to achieve our organization's targets. But in terms of look and feel, our engineers are already used to what we have. And I do prefer Tufin. View full review »
Technical Director at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
We evaluated Tufin together with FireMon and AlgoSec. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: June 2019.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mohd Majmi Mohamad
Regional OSH at Pos Malaysia Berhad
We have done other PoCs with AlgoSec and FireMon. But as we compared Tufin with them I preferred Tufin rather than AlgoSec. They were basically the same, but then Tufin came out with a lot of changes in their recent update. Also, Tufin is real-time while AlgoSec is near-real-time, for policy management. View full review »
Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
We compared AlgoSec, Tufin, and Skybox side-by-side. Originally, the team chose Skybox. They threw in what a lot of other groups had wanted, like the network team, security team, and DevOps team. When I sat them down (because I voted Tufin), I asked them why and they gave me all of the explanations that were all somebody else's reasons, not ours. I told them that this tool is for us and we needed a true orchestration automation tool. Not one that supports everyone else's automation, and we need one for firewalls. View full review »
Samuel Taxis
Information Security Engineer at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It has been a few years since I've looked at anything else. View full review »
Shawn Babinyecz
Cyber Security Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We also evaluated FireMon. We did not go with them because the solution was not as easy to install or incorporate in our organization. To us, Tufin just seemed to be the better product. View full review »
Consultant at Sirius Computer Solutions
I also know that we evaluated AlgoSec. View full review »
Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
We chose Tufin because its flexibility at the time was much greater than their competition. We did not evaluate less costly solutions. View full review »
Senior Adviser Cyber Security at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
We are going to keep Tufin as is, but we are going to add AlgoSec. The prices are comparable. We have corporate pricing with AlgoSec. The ease of use of AlgoSec is one of the reasons why we considered using it. View full review »
Senior Information Security Architect at First Citizens Bank
We like the visibility. That's why we went with this solution over other competitors. View full review »
Senior Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We are also evaluated Skybox and AlgoSec. Tufin is meeting one of our requirments, which is why we are looking to the future with the product. View full review »
Professional Services Engineer at a tech services company
We looked at AlgoSec and Tufin. However, we did not chose Tufin because of the issues. View full review »
Network Security at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
On the shortlist was AlgoSec, which was the only one that we actually tested. Tufin and AlgoSec were pretty much in the competitive price range, but this one provided us better integration into the Check Point environment. View full review »
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We also looked at AlgoSec. I was part of the decision-making process. View full review »
Marko Martin
Technical Team Lead at Paragon
We also looked at AlgoSec and FireMon. We did look at less expensive solutions than Tufin, but being a corporation, this solution made sense. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: June 2019.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sign Up with Email