Hyper-V Review

Even better than before


Last time I wrote a review on Hyper V for 2008 R2, which is the product I was using at the time. Having had experience with Hyper V "3.0", the version included in 2012, I figured it was time to update my review.

Pro's

Hyper-V definitely has its pros!

- This version of Hyper-V is even more in depth than before, bringing it up to par with and even surpassing vSphere in some ways.

- PowerShell scripting has been greatly expanded upon, allowing for more automation and centralized management.

- Exporting a VM and importing it into a new server, or setting up fail-over clustering is easier than ever!

- The integration with the new server manager and the existing MMC substructure is superb.

Cons:
The cons are the same as the last time.

- Individual licensing costs for each server.
- If you aren't using Hyper-V Core and are running Hyper-V on top of the full Server 2008 R2 platform, then you have less resources to allocate to your Virtual Machines.
- Except through RDP or SCVMM, there is no way to access the VM's on alternative platforms (like Mac or Linux).

All in all, Microsoft Hyper-V is an excellent platform and a great competitor for VMWare, and it keeps improving with each iteration!


Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

1 visitor found this review helpful
Add a Comment
Guest
4 Comments

author avatar
Top ReviewerTop 5Real User

Cool

author avatar
Vendor

Can you explain "Individual licensing costs for each server."?
Hyper-V it's free! How can you said that it's a con?

author avatar
Vendor

Sorry to say but you serious have to review this post! There is features and pros that only Hyper-V does that no other hypervisor does and you don't even mention! This post should be totally rewritten because it's not even close to say that it's complete!

author avatar
Top ReviewerTop 5Real User

Cool Marcos,

Would you be kind enough to add those missing features :>)

Thanks

Henry