IBM MQ Review

It's reliable, stable, and scalable.


What is most valuable?

The number one thing is it's pretty reliable with data integration. It gets done what we need to do; transport messages from source to destination.

How has it helped my organization?

It is the core component of what we do. We're using it to distribute messages from one platform to different multiple platforms.

What needs improvement?

We're moving to the next version. I really don't have anything I want improved. There are unknown bugs that we run across where we don't know where they are from, and the next fix pack will fix it.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability is pretty good, really. We have not had any downtime.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is good.

How are customer service and technical support?

My colleagues have used technical support. I would say it's good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I wasn't part of the decision to switch.

How was the initial setup?

I was not involved in the initial setup.

What other advice do I have?

Use it.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More IBM MQ reviews from users
...who work at a Financial Services Firm
...who compared it with Apache Kafka
Add a Comment
Guest
1 Comment

author avatarLea Goldberger
Consultant

What helped you decide to move to the next version?