What is our primary use case?
We are a system integrator and IBM PowerVM is one of the solutions that we implement for our clients. I am not a solution architect, but I provide assistance with PowerVM.
It is primarily used for business-critical operations like SAP or Oracle databases.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the flexibility in terms of managing the hardware resources such as RAM, CPU, and the network.
What needs improvement?
The interface is not user-friendly in places, so it could use some improvement.
If PowerVM were cheaper then it would better compete with VMware vCenter.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for five or six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not seen any issues and I think that stability-wise, this is quite a good solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution architect in our team has not complained about the scalability.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have involved technical support in the past when we have had issues and I think that they are good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are also supporting VMware vSphere and Microsoft Hyper-V.
Customers generally choose IBM PowerVM when they have a great demand for stability. However, they sometimes choose VMware because it is cheaper.
How was the initial setup?
With respect to the initial setup, if you know the terminology then it isn't too complex. It should nonetheless be done by somebody with a technical background.
The deployment takes approximately 14 days.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price varies from case to case and you have to negotiate it for every project. Pricing and licensing policies are not completely transparent.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to anybody who is researching this type of solution is to choose PowerVM if they want something that is really stable. I think that it is the only answer because the other solutions have perhaps evolved too quickly. We have seen issues with VMware and especially with Hyper-V. Hyper-V is not a mature platform.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?