We use it for backup and disaster recovery. We protect Windows and Linux servers, Windows 10, SQL, and Office 365.
We use it for backup and disaster recovery. We protect Windows and Linux servers, Windows 10, SQL, and Office 365.
It has streamlined data recovery, via a SaaS solution, to provide overarching protection. Metallic has also reduced the amount of manual work required to manage our backup operations by about 20 percent. In addition, it provides us with more predictable costs for our backup requirements because the egress charges are known.
There is room for improvement in the Knowledge Base and error reporting. I would like to see best practices in the Knowledge Base, and have the ability to diagnose errors without contacting support.
I have been using Commvault Metallic for three months.
It's stable. I've had some outages over the last week, but overall, it's stable.
It seems very scalable. We have plans to increase our usage of the solution.
Commvault's technical support is responsive.
There are multiple systems in place. We're in the process of replacing them.
As for the process of switching to Metallic, planning goes a long way. It's at an intermediate level between simple and complicated. We did the free trial and it was easy to get going.
We went with Metallic because it's a SaaS offering. It was one of the few solutions that offered SaaS with their own storage.
After doing it, it's straightforward, but it does require a little bit of understanding. It's in the middle between straightforward and complex. We're still in deployment but the initial setup took about one month.
Our implementation strategy is to cover critical applications: Office 365, Windows 10, and both Windows and Linux servers.
I've ran into some issues, which has made the configuration interface for configuring the solution for data protection more complex, but overall, if the instructions work, it's very simple.
The Commvault Success team helped. Other than that, it was just me. Their team was responsive. They pride themselves on making the product work for the client.
In terms of administrators of the system, there is just me in my role of network engineer. The individual users don't log in. We're a small business with under 200 users.
We evaluated Veeam and Rubrik. The pros for Metallic were that the costs were up-front and that it was a SaaS with dedicated cloud storage for endpoint and dedicated cloud storage for Office 365, separating those silos.
The drawback with Metallic is that it takes a bit of work to understand the process for registering clients, but once you have it down, it goes quickly.
Take your time to run the trial and understand what you're getting yourself into.
The move from on-premise to a cloud solution is definitely a change. Be patient with the process and open to understanding the SaaS solution.