Panaya Test Dynamix Review

Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing

What is our primary use case?

The primary user case is test management for user acceptance tests and business process testing. It is also used for test automation with record and play and codeless script editing, e.g., we can replay a test with different data sets.

How has it helped my organization?

  • It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.
  • Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.
  • We are able to test more things and be quicker with automatic documentation.

What is most valuable?

  • Automatic test documentation
  • Codeless automation
  • Collaboration into business process testing. This is very unique and useful!

What needs improvement?

They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great. Though, the standard defect workflow management is already great.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

How are customer service and technical support?

Support is reactive and in English only.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used HPQC. It was not fitted for business users, too old, expensive, and hard to use

How was the initial setup?

Onboarding was easy. There is a single training for the tester.

Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated QASymphony.

Panaya is more designed for BP testing. They started with SAP upgrades, so they could better understand ERP needs.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: July 2021.
523,431 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user