Juniper QFabric Competitors and Alternatives
Read reviews of Juniper QFabric competitors and alternatives
System Administrator at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Aug 2, 2020
This gives us control of our throughput traffic but it comes with mandatory options that increase cost
What is our primary use case?Our installation is totally on-premises. It is a backend solution supporting the entire campus. This is used as a three-tier network for our overall networking. We use it as a call switch at the backend, it is also used in the distribution, and it is used on the server farm switches. We use them for these three different kinds of purposes in the data center at the same time. All these servers can function on the network through these switches.
Pros and Cons
- "The ability to configure throughput is very flexible and improved the performance of our systems."
- "The availability of resources for learning about the product and doing evaluation of any issues is excellent."
- "Cisco forces end-users to accept billing for some capabilities or services that they may not want."
What other advice do I have?Advice that I would give others who are not using this Cisco solution is that maintenance is not a big deal for Cisco products. They deliver on customer support if it is even necessary at all. The Cisco team is always available to provide you the facts about the root cause of any problem or to answer any question. Because they have an excellent knowledge base, you can even research things and find solutions on your own. Whether you need this kind of dependability will have to do with your use case. If you are working on some kind of critical industry or environment, you can trust Cisco to be a…
Senior Network Design Engineer at Kent State University
Jul 9, 2019
Significantly increased our throughput and added redundancy to our data center
What is our primary use case?This solution is used in our data center. It is our layer-two switches that connect all of our servers to the data center firewall. Our data center is a little bit different than most in that we're only layer-two in the data center.
Pros and Cons
- "We leverage Cisco DCNM a lot, which allows us to automate."
- "Our only complaint is about the licensing because it can always be a little more cost-effective."
What other advice do I have?This product has absolutely surpassed our expectation of throughput. The network team used to be blamed for slowness in the data center, but now we can confidently say that it has nothing to do with us. We're providing the organization with eighty-gigs of throughput in all directions to the firewalls. Troubleshooting poorly-performing applications is easier now because we can say that the bottleneck is not in the data center. We could be doing much more with our Nexus 9K switches, but they are not doing as much as they are capable of because we only have layer-two in our data center. This is…
Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Jan 26, 2020
Has the ability to link simultaneously without user restrictions, good stability and good documentation
What is our primary use case?If clients want to avoid STP in their environment, which is usually the case with data center environments, and they want to use an active path, or have multiple paths going to the same resource. If they want to use them both, they use FabricPath. The solution is only supported on Nexus platforms, however. Users should aware of what they're using in the data center.
Pros and Cons
- "The technical support we get from Cisco is excellent. It's the best in the industry. We're more than satisfied with the level of service they provide."
- "The pricing could be adjusted to make it easier to sell to clients."
What other advice do I have?We're a reseller as well as a partner. We primarily deal with Cisco products at my organization. I have some knowledge of Aruba as well. FabricPath is Cisco's version of TRILL, an open-source version. I work for a value-added reseller and we're also a system integrator. I work as a technical consultant and I'm more versed in the solution's details, rather than the implementation side of things. Most of our customers range from SMBs to government sector organizations. I'd advise others to do their due diligence and read up on the solution first. Everyone should go through the documentation and…
Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Jan 19, 2020
Easy to configure and integrates well with Cisco hardware, but incompatible with SDN
What is our primary use case?Dell PowerConnect Switches make up part of our network and they are connected to our Dell servers.
Pros and Cons
- "Dell PowerConnect Switches are easy to configure."
- "It would be great to have modules that integrate with SDN solutions such as Cisco ACI, Arista SDN, Huawei Agile, and IBM."
What other advice do I have?We have decreased our use of Dell PowerConnect Switches in the past year because we are moving to virtualization and using SDN switches. The problem comes about because it is difficult to see the server end-point directly on the SDN. For our Dell servers, we are replacing the switches with pass-through modules because the spanning tree loops are the same. My advice for anybody who is considering this solution is to consider issues that might occur when using devices from multiple vendors. We found this difficult because of the integration. We like Dell because it is easy to use and it…
Self Employed at Switact
Real UserTop 20
Jan 8, 2020
Stable, easy to implement, good technical support, and you can replace and update for its lifetime
What is our primary use case?The primary use case of this solution is as a switch and we are working on link aggregation switches at the moment.
Pros and Cons
- "It has a lifetime warranty, that includes lifetime updates."
- "If you make a change and you disconnect yourself from the switch, you will create an issue."