Selenium HQ Benefits

Mahesh Kukrani
QA Test Lead at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It has largely improved our efficiency in QA. So every regression we don’t have to run a lot of repeatable test cases for which the flow didn’t change. However they are important to execute, so automation helps us there. Daily Smoke runs and weekly regression runs ensure that Build is continuously tested, which helps in Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. I must be cautious here: You cannot automate everything as you still need the exploratory and cognitive behavior of a human being. So a part of testing over releases will still be manual. Efficiency can be achieved on repeatable tasks, which is still quite a gain. View full review »
Michelle XIE
Senior Automation Test Developer/Automation Test Architect at a software R&D company with 51-200 employees
* We have automation tests (API, UI, unit, integration tests, and etc.). It saves on our manual QA time. * It reduces our manual QA repeatable works. * It saves our manual QA's energy. * The QA time move from manual QA to automation QA, and improve the relationship between developer and QA, Since automation tests make them work closer. * QA becomes more technical and love to know more about technical and architecture of the code such as they have to use GitHub, CI system, servers, and etc. * QA know more about tests such as unit tests, integration tests, and Selenium UI tests. * Make QA life much fun/easier. * Deduce the developers work such as automation QA/developer develops the test library and test framework, both developer and QA, some times, PM also can develop their own tests by using the test library and test framework. View full review »
Deva Veluchamy
Test Automation Lead/Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Web-based application automation are mostly done using Selenium. It's the right automation tool as a replacement for manual regression testing that indispensably reduces the testing time due to its cross-browser, parallel, and remote executions. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2019.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Jim Jordan
Quality Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The primary benefit is its cost and the ability to use the cloud. We use it with Sauce Labs. So, we have a large base of real devices and emulators, as well as breadth of coverage. View full review »
Sanjeev Gupta
Principal Consultant at Digital Web Advisors Pvt Ltd
Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. However, we have been using Selenium to automate our testing process since day one. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run. We plan to further optimize it and bring this duration down to about 12 hours. We plan to integrate Selenium with JMeter for performance testing, too. View full review »
Sujal Gupta
Senior Software Quality Assurance Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
* It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license * Support different programming language hence DevOps and QA work together to built better test suite * Since it is a lightweight tool, hence it helps in running test cases fast View full review »
Kanika Gupta
QA Expert at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It has helped our organization as automating the test cases is much easier and faster now. It covers a wide range of test cases and in many browsers. View full review »
Saurabh Chauhan
Project Engineer at Mathworks India Pvt Ltd
As traditional load testing we use some expensive tools available in the market, but with the help of Selenium we started automating the browser and done load testing for light application. View full review »
Adarsh Em
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Automates more than 5000 test cases and takes around 30-36 hours by which it reduces the manual effort of one QA person in 20-25 days. View full review »
Allan Herbert Medeiros
Engenheiro de automação de teste at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Selenium has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only. View full review »
AutomationEng384
Selenium Automation Engineer at a individual & family service with 10,001+ employees
Reduced license cost View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2019.
348,558 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sign Up with Email