Selenium HQ Review

CI can be achieved with tools like Jenkins. Like QTP, there should be an option to run the test from a point or state of application.


What is most valuable?

  • It supports many programming languages like Java, and Ruby etc.
  • It can be plugged with Junit, TestNG and other Java frameworks for reporting
  • CI can be achieved with tools like Jenkins

How has it helped my organization?

Cost effective solution for automation test.

What needs improvement?

Dynamic Debugging needs to be improved. Like QTP, there should be an option to run the test from a point or state of application. Currently the test should be run from the beginning to debug or test the new scenario which has been added.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for three years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

There were no issues with the deployment.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There are stability issues, especially when Mozilla Firefox updates.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There's no scalability issues.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

It wasn't very difficult.

What was our ROI?

We did it in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It's free and there's no licence needed.

What other advice do I have?

An engineer from any background can learn and build automation easily.

**Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
More Selenium HQ reviews from users
Add a Comment
Guest