The primary use is for distributing internet bandwidth. The performance is good.
The primary use is for distributing internet bandwidth. The performance is good.
The benefit is the constant delivery of internet bandwidth. Everybody is getting internet access properly. When 40 - 50 people are sitting in a small area it is capable of delivering internet to them constantly.
It delivers constantly, there is no break in the internet using these devices. It also automatically gets connected when the internet comes back. Failure is very low.
What I would like to have with these kinds of devices is the most enhanced security. For example, if I could apply security from wireless devices, that would be great.
I would also like more enhanced reports on user adoption, who is getting what bandwidth. That is the kind of report I should be getting.
It's completely stable.
Scalability is good. Suppose there are 20 people in a room and suddenly 10 more people come into the room. It automatically scales up and provides the internet.
A situation where we have had to contact technical support has never happened in the last year. It has been really constant in the distribution of the bandwidth.
I wanted experience using more products. We were already using another product but I thought, "Okay, let's try Aruba this time and see what the feedback is like." I thought Aruba would give me better performance, after looking at the performance of the existing devices.
When selecting a vendor, the most important factor is that support has to be there. I would look for constant support from any vendor. It can't be that the product is sold and after that there is no support. There has to be constant and quick support from the vendor.
The setup is straightforward, it's not complex. Things are quite easy with Aruba.
We were looking at different products for our new premises. Aruba was known to me so I compared Aruba with Ruckus.
I would definitely recommend Aruba devices.
I rate Aruba Wireless at nine out of 10 because of the performance and stability of the product. It's not a 10 because it needs enhanced security and a more granular level of reporting. If these kinds of things were provided it could be a 10.