- Scalability
- High availability
- Distributed architecture
- Supported platforms
It has simplified our architecture when compared to our previous solution. We now have less servers, and just one solution to monitor all environments (LAN, DMZ).
Administration interface, in particular the infrastructure manager. The event console could also use a make-over.
I've been using it for two years, including Nimsoft v7.
There are no issues if you are well prepared.
No issues were encountered.
No issues were encountered.
It's very good.
Technical Support:It's very good.
We previously used CA Unicenter NSM, but we switched to UIM because NSM was an end of life product and CA no longer supported some common platforms (like RH64bit agents).
It's relatively straightforward, as we spent lots of time on the assessment and architecture analysis.
We implemented it in-house.
If you have a highly heterogeneous environment, CA UIM has the best chance of supporting all of your platforms (including probes for more exotic ones). The ease of scaling out your initial setup, the distributed architecture (Nimsoft has its roots in the service provider world) as well as the high availability are all differentiators.