SmartBear TestLeft Review

Simple to set up and the test execute feature is helpful, but the cost could be reduced


What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is Point of Sale (POS) testing.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features are test executor and development.

What needs improvement?

TestLeft captures a lot of space in terms of memory, which is one issue that can be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been usingĀ SmartBear TestLeft for the past month.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability-wise, TestLeft is good. If there were some improvement in terms of memory usage then it would be awesome.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Currently, there are three developers who are using it.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have not faced any technical challenges so I have yet to contact them.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to SmartBear, we used Micro Focus UFT.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost should be reduced.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Aside from UFT and TestLeft, we evaluated some other tools.

The deciding factor was the cost.

What other advice do I have?

In summary, this is a good product.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Which version of this solution are you currently using?

Desktop
**Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, SeleniumHQ, Progress Software and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2021.
523,535 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Add a Comment
ITCS user
Guest